Did Rutgers have some kind of streak against beating top 10 teams at home? Did Rutgers score any points in the paint? Never heard the announcers touch on this
The problem I had was that they kept nattering on about it and forgot to call the game in progress.I'll bite...didn't particularly care for the commentary today either. Wasn't good...wasn't terrible either. The reason that they kept making comments about Rutgers scoring points in the paint was because THEY COMPLETELY DOMINATED US IN THE PAINT ALL GAME LONG. Hard to not comment on something that is happening for the entire game. Just sayin...
I'll bite...didn't particularly care for the commentary today either. Wasn't good...wasn't terrible either. The reason that they kept making comments about Rutgers scoring points in the paint was because THEY COMPLETELY DOMINATED US IN THE PAINT ALL GAME LONG. Hard to not comment on something that is happening for the entire game. Just sayin...
And Doris made the comment that Dion should have kicked to Scoop in the corner instead of missing that lay-up on the drive.
I'm as frustrated as anyone with Dion's recent inability to finish, but how is a Scoop 21-footer a higher percentage shot than a Dion lay-up?
Scoop was wide open on the wing for a three...not a defender within 8 feet of him. Rather than passing it to Scoop, as he should have, he selfishly takes the ball himself into a clusterf!!k of Rutgers defenders (gets mugged) and takes a terrible shot. You're acting like Waiters missed an uncontested lay-up or something.
And Doris made the comment that Dion should have kicked to Scoop in the corner instead of missing that lay-up on the drive.
I'm as frustrated as anyone with Dion's recent inability to finish, but how is a Scoop 21-footer a higher percentage shot than a Dion lay-up?
Because Scoop was wide open without a defender anywhere near him while Dion forced his supposed lay-up amongst three defenders?
Not saying she should have made that big a deal out of it, but you calling her on it seems odd considering the biggest shot of the game was probably Scoop's uncontested three with a little more than a minute to play.
Cheers,
Neil
What I did hear (I think) was that Dion is NOT Scoops cousin. Despite what is reported in the PS, they are tight but not related. HUH? there was another comment by Doris that when I heard it, I went "ah no, that ain't right" but no I can't think of what it was. It was early in the game. I'll have to watch my tape to see what it was.Did Rutgers have some kind of streak against beating top 10 teams at home? Did Rutgers score any points in the paint? Never heard the announcers touch on this
The late three was a great shot. Doesn't change the fact that any three Scoop takes is a relatively low-percentage shot - probably no more likely to go in than someone else's contested layup attempt is to go in or result in a pair of free throws.
What I did hear (I think) was that Dion is NOT Scoops cousin. Despite what is reported in the PS, they are tight but not related. HUH? there was another comment by Doris that when I heard it, I went "ah no, that ain't right" but no I can't think of what it was. It was early in the game. I'll have to watch my tape to see what it was.
Worth noting...over the past 5 games, Scoop has shot 50% (7-14) from 3 point range. Also, I wish there was a stat about his 3 point shooting percentage in the last 5 minutes of the second half. He seems to make them when they count the most.
And Doris made the comment that Dion should have kicked to Scoop in the corner instead of missing that lay-up on the drive.
I'm as frustrated as anyone with Dion's recent inability to finish, but how is a Scoop 21-footer a higher percentage shot than a Dion lay-up?
And Doris made the comment that Dion should have kicked to Scoop in the corner instead of missing that lay-up on the drive.
I'm as frustrated as anyone with Dion's recent inability to finish, but how is a Scoop 21-footer a higher percentage shot than a Dion lay-up?
Even so, how many times does Scoop knock down an open three? 3 of 10? Probably no more often than Dion converts his shot.
Even if Dion makes his shot slightly more often, it's still better for scoop to have taken the shot because he gets 50% more points if he makes it. That was a bad play by Dion in my book.
I think they may have confused Rick Jackson and Scoop. I remember an article quoting Scoop's Grama saying that everybody thought Rick and Scoop were related because they were always together and she always considered Rick another grandchild but that wasn't the case. That was the first I heard that Scoop and Dion weren't related and I think I want another opinion before I take it as fact.
I think they may have confused Rick Jackson and Scoop. I remember an article quoting Scoop's Grama saying that everybody thought Rick and Scoop were related because they were always together and she always considered Rick another grandchild but that wasn't the case. That was the first I heard that Scoop and Dion weren't related and I think I want another opinion before I take it as fact.
The late three was a great shot. Doesn't change the fact that any three Scoop takes is a relatively low-percentage shot - probably no more likely to go in than someone else's contested layup attempt is to go in or result in a pair of free throws.
With his recent hot shooting from 3, Scoop is now at 36% (.356) on the season. BT is shooting .361 and KJ .371. Those are the three highest % for the 'core' of the lineup. For all intensive purposes, Scoop is as good a 3pt shooter as anyone on the team this season.
Is Dion .356 for left-handed layups in traffic?