sabach
All American
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 5,639
- Like
- 9,094
if the following two questions were answered. FWIW, I believe that Bernie is innocent, but that does not change the following.
1) In 2003 when Davis went to the SPD, why did the SPD just blow him off saying that the SOL had run? When he accuses someone of molestation, especially if that person still has access to kids, the SPD has got to do more than say "go away - SOL expired", they need to investage the claim even if the SOL had run. This is exactly what they are doing now, even though the SOL has run even more now eight years later. SPD looks bad today for doing now what they didn't do before.
2) When SU does its investigation in 2005, why didn't they go to the police. If the answer is that the accuser said he already went and they didn't do anything, that's a crappy reason. Did anyone at SU confirm this with the police? If not, that is wrong. I always independently confirm whatever my clients tell me so that I don't look like a fool later. Someone at BS&K should have advised SU to go to the police before the BS&K investigation started or advised them to give the BS&K report to the police once it was completed. In effect, this is exactly what BS&K and SU did yesterday when they gave Fitzpatrick their 2005 report. SU and BS&K loo bad today for doing now what they didn't do before.
1) In 2003 when Davis went to the SPD, why did the SPD just blow him off saying that the SOL had run? When he accuses someone of molestation, especially if that person still has access to kids, the SPD has got to do more than say "go away - SOL expired", they need to investage the claim even if the SOL had run. This is exactly what they are doing now, even though the SOL has run even more now eight years later. SPD looks bad today for doing now what they didn't do before.
2) When SU does its investigation in 2005, why didn't they go to the police. If the answer is that the accuser said he already went and they didn't do anything, that's a crappy reason. Did anyone at SU confirm this with the police? If not, that is wrong. I always independently confirm whatever my clients tell me so that I don't look like a fool later. Someone at BS&K should have advised SU to go to the police before the BS&K investigation started or advised them to give the BS&K report to the police once it was completed. In effect, this is exactly what BS&K and SU did yesterday when they gave Fitzpatrick their 2005 report. SU and BS&K loo bad today for doing now what they didn't do before.