Was that the one that we took a penalty for so we could get off a longer kick? I love those.That was confirmed on the 1st half punt on 4th and 5 from the PED St. 35.
Was that the one that we took a penalty for so we could get off a longer kick? I love those.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Was that the one that we took a penalty for so we could get off a longer kick? I love those.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
And why did we want a specific kicker there?We got the kicker we wanted with that move. Even Mike Patrick knew that one.
I think we might have a meathead
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
How did the Asian lady react?I actually used that word loudly at the parlor and had you in mind, milly.
That punt by shafer showed me he has a feel for the game and that he will go with his gut, the easy call is to go for it there, but given the flow of the game the right call was the punt, 100% the right call. Regardless of what people say, it worked!!! Who cares about what people learned in their entry level statistics class, results are all that matter.
Real world versus book world...
The result was what? The offense needed every second it could getThat punt by shafer showed me he has a feel for the game and that he will go with his gut, the easy call is to go for it there, but given the flow of the game the right call was the punt, 100% the right call. Regardless of what people say, it worked!!! Who cares about what people learned in their entry level statistics class, results are all that matter.
Real world versus book world...
the offense had more than enough time. The problem was that you could have given us 10 downs to make a first and I don't think we would have got a first down, let alone a td.The result was what? The offense needed every second it could get
Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
And why did we want a specific kicker there?
Spoiler alert - the answer is pretty dumb.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
The result was what? The offense needed every second it could get
Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
It's not like it was a shut out. I'm not on board with the waterboy strategy. There was a stretch in 07 I think where the offense was so bad that punting on first down would have been less negative than trying on offense. But that was just barely and that was the worst stretch of offensive football everYour just being difficult with this... We had a better chance of winning that game with a fumble recovery/ return or a punt return than we did with the offense. Shafer was correct with what he did in the context of how the game had developed. Only reason we were in the game was the defense and turnovers.
We had a better chance of winning that game with a fumble recovery/ return or a punt return than we did with the offense.
That we have 2 punters? What's dumb about that?
So, you weren't watching but you know it was the wrong thing to do? Okay.It's not like it was a shut out. I'm not on board with the waterboy strategy. There was a stretch in 07 I think where the offense was so bad that punting on first down would have been less negative than trying on offense. But that was just barely and that was the worst stretch of offensive football ever
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
That's the same logic you get from the person at the black jack table who hits on 19 and gets a 2. Regardless of the outcome, it was a dumb move.Regardless of what people say, it worked!!! Who cares about what people learned in their entry level statistics class, results are all that matter.
Real world versus book world...
Yep. I watched it later. Clock and scoreboard. Bad offenses score more than good defensesSo, you weren't watching but you know it was the wrong thing to do? Okay.