What I'm saying isn't an opinion, it's looking at the actual turnover numbers. For example, against OSU, Frank had 0 in 24 mins, GTown 2/17, Buff 3/32. In league play he's got 14 turnovers in 216 mins or 1 every 15 mins. ND 2/29, Clem 2/35, GT 3/24, Duke 3/32, Pitt 0/34 (JB said they come at you all game long), Miami 1/27 and VaTech 3/35. You're entitled to your opinion but it's Bees who has seen Frank up close and personal from the front row and he says Frank's another coach on the floor, so in terms of running the team, I'm going with Bees. If Frank were as flustered as you say in sets, wouldn't it reflect in his turnover numbers? As for the offense's probs at VaTech, all I can say is there are 4 other guys out there who didn't do much all game long. And on defense Robinson wasn't one guy's assignment, VaTech moved the ball really well and basically played out of their minds the whole game.
I'm not implying that he's a turnover machine or that statistically his numbers aren't decent in that regard. And, I never said anything about him not being like another coach on the floor, however, to the coach on the floor thing, isn't that kind of a trait of what your point guard is suppose to be anyways? Isn't that a general standard at that position and hence why PG's are referenced as "the floor general" or QB of the team?
As another poster mentioned, our offense is not one of high risk, and a lot of dribbling in place, passing back in forth between the circles, etc. kind of thing. So, that in and of itself, limits turnovers, etc. I don't think the teams you cited above are intense ball pressuring, hounding type teams, I'm specifically referring to, other than VPI the other night. And, that's what I'm mostly suggesting, that in times of aggressive, hounding ball pressure is when Frank really appears to struggle.
Just because his statistical turnover ratio isn't bad in these high ball pressure type games, doesn't mean that he's not having difficulty with his handle, just look at the difficulty we have in scoring. Frank struggles getting by his defender or creating an advantage because he can't take people off the dribble, and some of it is due to his handle not being optical, as well as not being quick a foot. When this happens, our O seems out of sync and discombobulated. Moreover, because of same, it puts extra pressure on our other guys to attempt to get open on their own, create their own space, etc. If, in those situations, Frank could get by people with his ball skills, etc., he has the size to create an advantage. But, because his handle isn't his strength (IMO) he's unable to do this.
This is what I'm generally referring to when I say it's my opinion, based on the games I've seen him play in against those particular types of teams. I feel Frank's main assets are his ability to see the floor (when not be hounded) due to his size and passing skills, followed by his ability to shoot when he's open and not under duress.
