Fine, but he had a poor 1st half.We lose by 20 if it wasn't for Rak.
meh, I could just as easily say Rak's 1st half cost us the game.
And if he's not our most reliable ft shooter, then who is?
But if you listed the reasons for today's loss, Gbinije would have to be #1, far and away.
Also, that whole "Rak is our most reliable FT shooter" thing, yeah, I still disagree with that.
not latelyI still think that TC is our most reliable FT shooter.
Fine, but he had a poor 1st half.
Mike made some plays that helped keep us in the game
did you read my post? I said he had a poor 1st half, nothing about his 2nd half. The only reason we made it close by halftime was RobersonThe game was tied at the half, and he has 18 in the 2nd half, what else do you want him to do? He can't give himself the ball
did you read my post? I said he had a poor 1st half, nothing about his 2nd half. The only reason we made it close by halftime was Roberson
Again, I would argue that his contributions in this game negated his bad plays - a wash for G.Mike g's play definitely cost us the game. Its not debatable
Hm, just think if he'd had a decent 1st halfAnd with his poor first half, we were still tied with them.
Hm, just think if he'd had a decent 1st half
Roberson had a terrific 1st half.Or if other guys had come to play.
meh, I could just as easily say Rak's 1st half cost us the game.
And if he's not our most reliable ft shooter, then who is?
Roberson had a terrific 1st half.
hey thanks!Dumb comment.
Such as it is, this team is now dependent on Rak to be consistently (i.e., every half) elite. Anything more than solid rebounding from TR is a bonus.And what did he do in the 2nd half? Using the same logic as you did with Rak.