Jim Boeheim Believes Syracuse Needs $10 million in NIL to Be Competitive | Syracusefan.com

Jim Boeheim Believes Syracuse Needs $10 million in NIL to Be Competitive

I think they are close to or already there. Also I chuckled when the reporter asked to estimate where we are and Jim said he had no idea, he is not involved lol. Maybe he really doesn’t know, but isn’t he the special assistant to the AD and is on the fundraising trail?
Should note that there’s no reason he would say so even if he did know
 
This was also from the same interview:

I read two things from this:

1) it’s the school line: BOOOO
2) it’s what he actually believes which means some arguments made by some others on this board remain dumb af and that he continues to be out of touch with modern game
 
Dennis Haysbert Shut Up GIF
 
I just think back on the whole "the scholarship is fair compensation" discussion and cry laugh.

Well, for the most part, everything in life is relative.

I wonder if you "cry laugh" over this outrageous fact too?


The data shows that CEOs are paid much more today than they were in the mid-1990s and many times what they earned in the 1960s or 1970s. In fact, realized compensation for CEOs is now 1,094% higher than it was in 1978. Over the same period, the pay for typical workers only increased 26%. As a result, the CEO-to-worker compensation ratio grew tremendously—nearly tenfold—from 31-to-1 in 1978 to 281-to-1 in 2024.
 
Well, for the most part, everything in life is relative.

I wonder if you "cry laugh" over this outrageous fact too?


The data shows that CEOs are paid much more today than they were in the mid-1990s and many times what they earned in the 1960s or 1970s. In fact, realized compensation for CEOs is now 1,094% higher than it was in 1978. Over the same period, the pay for typical workers only increased 26%. As a result, the CEO-to-worker compensation ratio grew tremendously—nearly tenfold—from 31-to-1 in 1978 to 281-to-1 in 2024.
All true but why post that on this board?
 
UConn has 12M+ for NIL this year so to win a natty, it makes sense. Of course you need a good coach too. And five years is ridiculous
I think 5 years was what it used to be. And it may well be now if you have the right guy and for some reason, he is off to a slow start. But sometimes you just know you have the wrong guy. Like Stallings at Pitt a few years ago. I would ask JB who knows more about hoop than any of us, what are we trying to do on offense? Can you make sense of our substitution patterns (wrong guy to ask, I know) I'll hang up and listen.
 
Well, for the most part, everything in life is relative.

I wonder if you "cry laugh" over this outrageous fact too?


The data shows that CEOs are paid much more today than they were in the mid-1990s and many times what they earned in the 1960s or 1970s. In fact, realized compensation for CEOs is now 1,094% higher than it was in 1978. Over the same period, the pay for typical workers only increased 26%. As a result, the CEO-to-worker compensation ratio grew tremendously—nearly tenfold—from 31-to-1 in 1978 to 281-to-1 in 2024.
I do.

I cry laugh pretty hard over that one.
 
I think 5 years was what it used to be. And it may well be now if you have the right guy and for some reason, he is off to a slow start. But sometimes you just know you have the wrong guy. Like Stallings at Pitt a few years ago. I would ask JB who knows more about hoop than any of us, what are we trying to do on offense? Can you make sense of our substitution patterns (wrong guy to ask, I know) I'll hang up and listen.
He saw the loss to Hofstra and is digging in protecting his guy after he himself said at the beginning of the season this would be a good team.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
175,474
Messages
5,241,769
Members
6,183
Latest member
odu74

Online statistics

Members online
237
Guests online
6,924
Total visitors
7,161


P
Top Bottom