magic is a better pick than stockton on any kind of team anywhere anytime. magic won an ncaa championship, 5 nba championships, and his teams made the finals 9 times in his 12 year career.
Ding..ding...ding...case closed!
magic is a better pick than stockton on any kind of team anywhere anytime. magic won an ncaa championship, 5 nba championships, and his teams made the finals 9 times in his 12 year career.
Stockton couldnt make his teammates better? Stockton on a team that needs defense and outside shooting at the pg spot would be the better pick. So no, not that simple.
Not to the level where any of his teams won anything significant. Unless you count winning the West after previously better teams like the Rockets, Blazers, and Suns were old and tapped out, the Sonics imploded, and the Lakers weren't ready yet. They were just kind of there. Give him and them credit for hanging around at a high enough level to capitalize when things were down.
Well... they did it twice.
Yeah, they deserve credit for their consistency. My point is, those teams really weren't any better than all the Jazz teams that got bounced in the first-2nd round so many times in the previous decade. They were basically the same as they always were...just everybody else got worse for a couple years.
I have a hard time seeing why Lebron would get tons of credit for getting the Cavs out of a craptacular east
once.
I know Simmons is a big proponent of the west falling apart a bit in the late 90's theory.
For sure the East in 07 was much weaker than the West was in 97/98. I don't think he gets a ton of credit for it though, right? Though to be fair, it's not exactly the same comp. If Lebron was playing with another HOF like Stockton then the Cavs would've blown through the East. If he does get credit, its because the guy who was second on the team in minutes played that year was Larry Hughes. And I think Drew Gooden was third or fourth. So a little different.
I think Stockton is awesome, but it's Magic all day every day.
Well there you go. I think we've reached a stalemate of sorts.
I would posit that taking a team that had Larry Hughes and Drew Gooden prominently involved to the finals isn't quite the same as taking one with Karl Malone and Jeff Hornacek as the other good players to the finals.
Not to the level where any of his teams won anything significant. Unless you count winning the West after previously better teams like the Rockets, Blazers, and Suns were old and tapped out, the Sonics imploded, and the Lakers weren't ready yet. They were just kind of there. Give him and them credit for hanging around at a high enough level to capitalize when things were down.
Magic over Stockton on any team, ever, period. That simple. Not even close.
Not to the level where any of his teams won anything significant. Unless you count winning the West after previously better teams like the Rockets, Blazers, and Suns were old and tapped out, the Sonics imploded, and the Lakers weren't ready yet. They were just kind of there. Give him and them credit for hanging around at a high enough level to capitalize when things were down.
Magic over Stockton on any team, ever, period. That simple. Not even close.
Then having Magic face a tough small quick footed PG such as Stockton would have him in fits. Such as Stockton did in his entire career against Magic, especially in the playoffs where he abused the Lakers. You're making it in terms of who is the better player. Obviously its Magic. I am making it like Malone did and who would be the best for a team
Then having Magic face a tough small quick footed PG such as Stockton would have him in fits. Such as Stockton did in his entire career against Magic, especially in the playoffs where he abused the Lakers. You're making it in terms of who is the better player. Obviously its Magic. I am making it like Malone did and who would be the best for a team