kcsu
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 21,962
- Like
- 49,159
How to defend it.Serious question… What specifically did they “figure out?”
How to defend it.Serious question… What specifically did they “figure out?”
My reference is to his tempo.What do you mean by figured out? They ran all the same common plays as everyone else. Everyone runs inside/outside zone, counters and power plays. Anae runs them too. Their pass concepts and Rpo plays were just as common. Play caling and execution was the problem (Gilbert sucked and the O line was horrendous). The most basic offenses are some of the most lethal ones when you execute them right.
Great post and I wanted to add/ask:It seems clear to me that the failure of the Babers system was driven by the lack of horizontal stretch plays in the passing game beginning in 2019. Go back and watch any games from 2016-2018 and it's very noticeable, especially in the early game scripts how they were making an effort to attack the flats to force the outside linebackers to get wider in pre-snap alignments. Then they would mix in inside zone runs to get the safeties to move up to account for both the stretches to the flat and the running lanes between the backers. And this opened up the vertical and one-on-one passing game, which is what the Babers offense really thrived on.
I've had the conviction that this shift was personnel driven. I saw Devito as just being unwilling to throw those hook and seam routes to the slot receivers, where the ball had to be delivered into a tight window. On the other hand, I'm not quite sure why we got away from throwing the wide receiver screen pass into the 2x2 stack on the outside. This was an easy throw that Devito was perfectly suited for. This was a bread and butter play for Dungey, but beginning in 2019, it seems to have suddenly gone away.
My hope is that the passing game can get back to the original mode of forcing the defense to make adjustments that open up other avenues of attack. I'm encouraged because Anae seems to use alignment and motions to prescribe pre-snap reads. I think this is preferable as it gives better information and simplifies the pre-snap routine for the quarterback. Anae also seems adept at exploiting the combination of the seam/flat routes with plays that also drag linebackers and safeties across the middle of the field. I think this is the perfect complement to Babers system of exploiting space, both horizontally and vertically.
That’s just wrong. I agree that no one will be content unless we go bowling. And ideally more then just bowling, a good bowl. But with our new hires, we are not going to bring the whole ship down in one year of being together. I think he has two years to make us happy about SUFB, whatever that means to our AD.Babers needs 7 wins or his job is gone so to do that passing option and play action have to be practiced repitition. WIth a rb in place throw it deep to lull the defense to sleep run Tucker and Shrader has speed good enough to do some outside the pocket deep passes.
Teams were able to defend us because we were one-dimensional. Better skill position players make us less so. Offense versus defense is always a game of take something away but give something up. You have to be “multiple” no matter what offense you run. The trouble was we weren’t able to take advantage. JMOMy reference is to his tempo.
Babers needs 7 wins or his job is gone so to do that passing option and play action have to be practiced repitition. WIth a rb in place throw it deep to lull the defense to sleep run Tucker and Shrader has speed good enough to do some outside the pocket deep passes.
I know you didn't ask for my opinion but here goes.Great post and I wanted to add/ask:
Do you think our QB being less of a running threat contributed to the move away from the horizontal passing game?
Not trying to start a back & forth on why/who’s fault (scheme change, DeVito or the poor OL he played behind) but it seemed to me the QB being less of a ground threat allowed opposing defenses to sit on those horizontal routes.
You think this contributed at all or is it chicken/egg (those routes would’ve opened up more running lanes regardless of QB or RB carrying)?
Gotcha. Keep in mind lots of teams do up tempo, including UVAMy reference is to his tempo.
It's a good question. I don't see the QB running situation with Devito as having an effect on the horizontal pass game. In fact, quite the opposite. When executed, streching the defense horizontally should relieve a lot of pressure off the qb and oline. It takes defenders out of the box and makes a blitz from the outside less likely and easier to pick up. Those quick passes out to the flat or in the seam between linebackers are predicated on speed, the ball has to get out of the qb's hands very quickly in order to exploit the reaction of a linebacker reading a pass play. They are equivalent to outside runs, but usually create a little bit of space underneath because of that split second reaction where the read of a pass play causes the defender to initiate a drop back. It was these subtle gaps in coverage (a reactive backpedal, a linebacker lining up deep, a safety lining up three yards short and inside, a corner who's hips are out of phase off the bump) that Devito never seemed to grasp or exploit.Great post and I wanted to add/ask:
Do you think our QB being less of a running threat contributed to the move away from the horizontal passing game?
Not trying to start a back & forth on why/who’s fault (scheme change, DeVito or the poor OL he played behind) but it seemed to me the QB being less of a ground threat allowed opposing defenses to sit on those horizontal routes.
You think this contributed at all or is it chicken/egg (those routes would’ve opened up more running lanes regardless of QB or RB carrying)?
Some people think a stop by the defense is a bad offensive call. Most of the time its a good play by the defense. I have a buddy that thinks every offensive play should work. lolThen we have the plays that we have no idea on. coaches called a play, they have the perfect audible to handle the D as shown and we dont check out or a player goes the wrong way. We have no idea on those how many of those did we have.. We run 60-80 plays a game and you probably have 10-20% of that type of thing happening.
Babers needs 7 wins or his job is gone
Great post and I wanted to add/ask:
Do you think our QB being less of a running threat contributed to the move away from the horizontal passing game?
Not trying to start a back & forth on why/who’s fault (scheme change, DeVito or the poor OL he played behind) but it seemed to me the QB being less of a ground threat allowed opposing defenses to sit on those horizontal routes.
You think this contributed at all or is it chicken/egg (those routes would’ve opened up more running lanes regardless of QB or RB carrying)?
A Senior Dungey saved Lynch in 2018, by creating plays out of nothing. He even said many times the play calls wouldn't work.How do these dates align with the changes:
2016 Sean Lewis
2017 Sean Lewis
2018 Mike Lynch
2019 Mike Lynch
2020 Sterlin Gilbert
2021 Sterlin Gilbert
How do these dates align with the changes:
2016 Sean Lewis
2017 Sean Lewis
2018 Mike Lynch
2019 Mike Lynch
2020 Sterlin Gilbert
2021 Sterlin Gilbert
you also had a bunch of times ED did not run the plays correctly. coaches were frustrated by that as well..A Senior Dungey saved Lynch in 2018, by creating plays out of nothing. He even said many times the play calls wouldn't work.
people also have to know what the play was to know why a play didnt work.,. we see a play and no one is open and think its a bad call. But maybe if the X ran the correct route the Y would have been open but when they dont no one gets open.. the D wants to win more than 50% of the time as well. Sometimes you win by play calls and sometimes you win by talent.Some people think a stop by the defense is a bad offensive call. Most of the time its a good play by the defense. I have a buddy that thinks every offensive play should work. lol
Good points. Something has to give. Most of the time it comes down to my guy is just better than yours.people also have to know what the play was to know why a play didnt work.,. we see a play and no one is open and think its a bad call. But maybe if the X ran the correct route the Y would have been open but when they dont no one gets open.. the D wants to win more than 50% of the time as well. Sometimes you win by play calls and sometimes you win by talent.
It's a good question. I don't see the QB running situation with Devito as having an effect on the horizontal pass game. In fact, quite the opposite. When executed, streching the defense horizontally should relieve a lot of pressure off the qb and oline. It takes defenders out of the box and makes a blitz from the outside less likely and easier to pick up. Those quick passes out to the flat or in the seam between linebackers are predicated on speed, the ball has to get out of the qb's hands very quickly in order to exploit the reaction of a linebacker reading a pass play. They are equivalent to outside runs, but usually create a little bit of space underneath because of that split second reaction where the read of a pass play causes the defender to initiate a drop back. It was these subtle gaps in coverage (a reactive backpedal, a linebacker lining up deep, a safety lining up three yards short and inside, a corner who's hips are out of phase off the bump) that Devito never seemed to grasp or exploit.
And I don't think Devito was not a threat to run the ball, he was fast enough to be a dangerous runner. More than anything he displayed an unwillingness to run, and clearly teams exploited that tendency. The Babers system doesn't rely on qb mobility so much as the recognition of when there are easy yards for the qb to pick up by tucking and running for an easy gain. Matt Johnson at Bowling Green was nowhere near the athlete Devito is, yet he routinely picked up lots of easy yards by running the ball when the underneath defenders had cleared out to defend against a vertical concept.
The problems with Devito were more complex than that. He ran more when he played this past year, but he's just not a dynamic runner or improviser.Yeah, the whole idea of an RPO, where the QB NEVER runs it, is pointless.
Much like how we'd often have Courtney motion across behind the QB to fake the sweep, and NEVER give him the ball.
Fakes don't work if the D knows it's a fake.
We went from extremes: Dungey often too prone to calling his own #, to then Devito NEVER calling his own # to run it.
Clearly the former was much more successful, but that's because ED was a baller who made things happen.
You could also try to align production with the quality, experience, depth and health of what we had in the OL personnel. 2018 was by far the best group. 2019 and 2020 - big issues.Good question. Not sure because I think the change in QB (Dungey to DeVito) distorts things.
Wonder how the dates align with the changes in OL coaching:
2016 Mike Lynch
2017 Mike Lynch
2018 Mike Cavanaugh
2019 Mike Cavanaugh
2020 Mike Cavanaugh
2021 Mike Schmidt
Edit - That's a lot of Mike's. Maybe we can hire a Tom, Dick or Harry.
IMO, this went away because there was no outside blocking and there was a distinct lack of physicality from the WR's, to the point they were physically overpowered by DB's. Went from a specimen in Custis, a physical Butler and Taj (with a physical Ravian Pierce) to Courtney and Taj w/ Luke Benson replacing Pierce. Not exactly a lot of physicality on the outside (though 2 NFL pass catchers).I've had the conviction that this shift was personnel driven. I saw Devito as just being unwilling to throw those hook and seam routes to the slot receivers, where the ball had to be delivered into a tight window. On the other hand, I'm not quite sure why we got away from throwing the wide receiver screen pass into the 2x2 stack on the outside. This was an easy throw that Devito was perfectly suited for. This was a bread and butter play for Dungey, but beginning in 2019, it seems to have suddenly gone away.