Okay, so the Orange Bowl may not have the ACC against a champion from the B1G, SEC, Big12, or PAC 12...of course in the semi rotation it could be two of those conferences in the Orange Bowl-that the ACC owns TV rights too regardless--and ACC champion goes to another bowl if not in the semi-finals.
Now let's discuss the other important/impact issue: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
The ACC is part of the new BCS big boy table (the BE etc make-up the Group of 5 that are not at the big boy table). It is estimated that the yearly TV rights for the new BCS is valued at around $500,000,000/yr for next 12 years (thank you ESPN). The top 5 conferences (ACC, B1G, Pac 12, SEC, and Big 12) will share EQUALLY A BASE AMOUNT while the group of 5 will get a smaller share to divide as they see fit among those conferences making up the group of 5...this means take their smaller payout and share it among 5 conferences with 40+ teams---ouch!
My NCState source indicates that what the ACC is looking at its shared base amount to be somewhere between $60-$75 million not counting revenue from the TV rights from Orange Bowl (ACC controls media rights even if a semi final game and an ACC team isnt in) to additional payouts based on academic excellence, # of teams selected in access bowl and the final NC. It is potentially possible that the each of the 14 team ACC may be hit with up to an additional $4,500,000-$6,000,000 per year. That of course does not include take from the Orange Bowl TV media rights which the ACC owns.
Bottom line: If all goes according to thought at this point...the ACC (including the addl game payout from having Notre Dame football play 2-3 games at ACC stadiums (including neutral site games called ACC home games) the $$$$$$$$$$ (minimally per team is projected at):
$25,500,000-$28,000,000/yr per ACC team (14 teams) including the Orange Bowl payout projected at only 50% of the media rights expected to be $55,000,000 or more.
The ACC move appears to have everything that 'Cuse could hope for:
1. Very good academic conference
s loas the $ issue is understood as king we arewinners . I believe winning the $ side is important but so is the winning on the field/court side of the equation.I don't want to be the bottom feeders in any of the glam sports FB,BB or lax.Also give the women their due in the ACC as well.
3. Good football conference--that will get better with these additional dollars
4. More $$$$$$$$ than any of us believed possible.
Discuss!