GoSU96
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 21,609
- Like
- 42,163
Read Miner's letter and you'll get a sense of what her concerns about the project are. There are always costs associated with something like this for the city. $200 million is not $500 million. Who pays the rest? The "private" owner/operator? How much realistically could you get from a naming sponsor? Who pays for infrastructure improvements that go along with a project of this size? She's right to be skeptical.
Do you think the City of Louisville is happy about the decision to float hundreds of millions in bonds for a building with only one tenant that doesn't come close to meeting the payments they have to make? If I were the Syracuse mayor, I'd want every penny accounted for before signing off on this project.
It's not the City of Syracuse floating the bonds. The City isn't being asked to drop a dime on the construction of the facility. What business is it of her's how the project if being paid for or what the ownership stake is.
I understand the infrastucture costs issue, but they are almost certaintly considered a cost of the project, but it not unreasonable to want that confirmed. If they are she should say great, where do I sign, and get out of the way.