gmoney44
All Conference
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 2,688
- Like
- 6,847
Would anyone think less of me if I had a "throw down" on Oliver Luck in some random airport concourse?
I’d think more of you.
Would anyone think less of me if I had a "throw down" on Oliver Luck in some random airport concourse?
It'll be interesting how Louisville recovers from this. Many here use them as how "fast" they recovered from their scandal and sanctions compared to how SU did.
He could get beltraned lol.Were they during while Pitino was there? If so Iona might be looking for a new coach.
Well, cleaning house is at least more than those other schools did. It’s proactive and definitely needed to be done. The current admin and coaches are so much better than before.This is all from the Pitino and FBI investigation. The problem is that they fired Pitino and cleaned house, so the ncaa will probably just give them a slap on the wrist. Ugh.
Or George O’LearyedHe could get beltraned lol.
Lol grow some plums and go after Kentucky, Duke and UNC.
kansas
I read the NCAA’s response. They seem none too happy and used words like “defiant posture” and “disappointed“ that Kansas would not accept any responsibility. Kansas is denying all of the allegations, despite the fact that 3 of their recruits got paid by adidas, because they don‘t believe adidas is a booster. Other cases, like Syracuse‘s and Kansas’ own infractions cases from years ago were cited as precedent on booster status and coaching control.
One thing that really stuck out is that Kansas still hasn‘t done anything in terms of compliance, changed anything with adidas or distanced the program from Gassnola or Gatto. NCAA noted that is a concern and a problem for KU. Also somehow, Larry Brown, is once again involved. Think the NCAA is going to hammer Kansas and Bill Self.
Reading KU’s response to this response, it just seems defiant, uncooperative and full of fluff, especially with regard to how highly their compliance department is regarded by their peers.
”Institution's Failure to Monitor
The University also strongly disagrees with the assertion that it failed to monitor the men's basketball program. The enforcement staff's allegations and conclusions regarding the University's compliance program are misguided. Kansas has one of the strongest compliance programs in the nation and it has been recognized by its peers nationally for its work. In addition, throughout this infractions process, Kansas has fully cooperated with the NCAA, participated in interviews, turned over requested materials and otherwise responded to all requests of the enforcement staff. The University takes seriously all NCAA and Big 12 bylaws, consistently provides education to its staff members, and monitors its programs to ensure compliance with these bylaws.”
Yet Gassnola and Gatto, widely regarded by KU as dirty mobster types, had unfettered access to their program, players, recruits and family members.
Kansas may be a blue blood, but the NCAA nearly destroyed them in 1988. They are in trouble.
Kansas is in big trouble
The NCAA said many of the same things about UNC and then conveniently STB.I read the NCAA’s response. They seem none too happy and used words like “defiant posture” and “disappointed“ that Kansas would not accept any responsibility. Kansas is denying all of the allegations, despite the fact that 3 of their recruits got paid by adidas, because they don‘t believe adidas is a booster. Other cases, like Syracuse‘s and Kansas’ own infractions cases from years ago were cited as precedent on booster status and coaching control.
One thing that really stuck out is that Kansas still hasn‘t done anything in terms of compliance, changed anything with adidas or distanced the program from Gassnola or Gatto. NCAA noted that is a concern and a problem for KU. Also somehow, Larry Brown, is once again involved. Think the NCAA is going to hammer Kansas and Bill Self.
Reading KU’s response to this response, it just seems defiant, uncooperative and full of fluff, especially with regard to how highly their compliance department is regarded by their peers.
”Institution's Failure to Monitor
The University also strongly disagrees with the assertion that it failed to monitor the men's basketball program. The enforcement staff's allegations and conclusions regarding the University's compliance program are misguided. Kansas has one of the strongest compliance programs in the nation and it has been recognized by its peers nationally for its work. In addition, throughout this infractions process, Kansas has fully cooperated with the NCAA, participated in interviews, turned over requested materials and otherwise responded to all requests of the enforcement staff. The University takes seriously all NCAA and Big 12 bylaws, consistently provides education to its staff members, and monitors its programs to ensure compliance with these bylaws.”
Yet Gassnola and Gatto, widely regarded by KU as dirty mobster types, had unfettered access to their program, players, recruits and family members.
Kansas may be a blue blood, but the NCAA nearly destroyed them in 1988. They are in trouble.
Would anyone think less of me if I had a "throw down" on Oliver Luck in some random airport concourse?
I read the NCAA’s response. They seem none too happy and used words like “defiant posture” and “disappointed“ that Kansas would not accept any responsibility. Kansas is denying all of the allegations, despite the fact that 3 of their recruits got paid by adidas, because they don‘t believe adidas is a booster. Other cases, like Syracuse‘s and Kansas’ own infractions cases from years ago were cited as precedent on booster status and coaching control.
One thing that really stuck out is that Kansas still hasn‘t done anything in terms of compliance, changed anything with adidas or distanced the program from Gassnola or Gatto. NCAA noted that is a concern and a problem for KU. Also somehow, Larry Brown, is once again involved. Think the NCAA is going to hammer Kansas and Bill Self.
Reading KU’s response to this response, it just seems defiant, uncooperative and full of fluff, especially with regard to how highly their compliance department is regarded by their peers.
”Institution's Failure to Monitor
The University also strongly disagrees with the assertion that it failed to monitor the men's basketball program. The enforcement staff's allegations and conclusions regarding the University's compliance program are misguided. Kansas has one of the strongest compliance programs in the nation and it has been recognized by its peers nationally for its work. In addition, throughout this infractions process, Kansas has fully cooperated with the NCAA, participated in interviews, turned over requested materials and otherwise responded to all requests of the enforcement staff. The University takes seriously all NCAA and Big 12 bylaws, consistently provides education to its staff members, and monitors its programs to ensure compliance with these bylaws.”
Yet Gassnola and Gatto, widely regarded by KU as dirty mobster types, had unfettered access to their program, players, recruits and family members.
Kansas may be a blue blood, but the NCAA nearly destroyed them in 1988. They are in trouble.
The NCAA said many of the same things about UNC and then conveniently STB.
That’s true. Think this is different, though. Kansas and Self have been giving the middle finger to the NCAA since before the season started. Depends on that booster definition, which seems the NCAA will stick to. At the end of the day, kids were getting paid through adidas, and the NCAA believes Kansas encouraged it. I don‘t see KU getting off lightly on this one,
The NCAA really needs to have someone come in and take control of the widespread paying of players. This person before penalizing anyone needs to describe violations and then assign a penalty to each. And then fairly investigate and accuse. Allow a retort, adjust findings honestly and then assess the penalty. The name of the school shouldn't matter.Tend to agree... although I certainly understand why people are skeptical about the NCAA actually enforcing their rules.
Similar to what happened to SU / Boeheim, I think that the NCAA might need to make an example out of Self here, or risk losing the few remaining vestiges of credibility they have as an enforcement / governing body.
We all know that under the NCAAs watch, amateur athletics has been a sham, and has turned into big business. But if the NCAA doesn't come down on this type of cheating, then they'll effectively be turning a blind eye to cheating on a grand scale, and basically conceding that they are essentially irrelevant and aren't even pretending to enforce the rules anymore.
Which is why they can't afford for Kansas / Self to get off easy. Ditto Arizona with Sean Miller, eventually.
Agree 100%.Will Wade and Sean Miller need to be on the NCAA’s chopping block. It will be outrageous if those two are still coaching in two years. And both LSU and Arizona need to have the hammer brought down on their programs.
I'm on the same page. I think the NCAA will conveniently find a way to avoid a major crackdown. They're scared, especially now, that their time might be limited and the big boys will break away.I'm taking the standard blue blood approach to (crippling) sanctions. I'll believe it when I see it.