Lunardi now has SU as a #2 seed

[2-3zone]

Kansas now on the #1 line

 

[cuse522]

But when I make a thread that asks if we're a lock for a 2 seed (granted, I had a typo in the subject line and switched 2 for 3, and fixed it in the post), it gets deleted??? I don't think I'm crazy to suggest we could end up as a 3-seed with a 1-1 finish and a 1-1 ACCT with the loss to Duke. Now Lunardi has us as a 2, which doesn't surprise me at all. Right now, Wichita State, Florida, Arizona, Duke, Uva, Kansas and Villanova are all threats to our seeding. That could put us in the last 2 seed, which means falling to a 3 is not out of the realm of possibility.

I'm shocked that thread got deleted, are we not allowed to speculate about the possible outcome of a 2-2 finish when SU is struggling? It's not like I made some BS post - I explained who was a threat, how it could go wrong, and ended it with an explanation of how I thought we could still get back to a 1.

 

[Jasonrob44]

Yeah,... I'll be more concerned with seedings after the conference tournaments commence and these things start to matter. At this point, I just want to get healthy and get back on track.

 

[AZOrange]

Kansas now on the #1 line

Lol. Wait until they lose tonight.

 

[samspann1]

still think that UVa is "garbage"?

I don't think they're nearly as good as some here are making them out to be, but IMO, they're far from "garbage"

 

[Chris02M]

right now there are only 2 lock #1 seeds.
Florida and Wichita State

the contenders for last 2 are:

Arizona
----------
(big gap)

Syracuse
Kansas
--------
(solid gap)
Wisconsin
Duke
Villanova

nobody else can get to the 1 line. Virginia tops out as a 2 seed. Virginia is very good definitely one of the top 12

 

[Chris02M]

unless we lose to Georgia tech I don't see us going lower than a 2 seed

 

[kirbivore]

IF SU is going to be a #2 seed, please put them in Witchita's bracket

 

[jdubs30]

I said this months ago; as long as we're in the East I don't care if we're a 1, 2 or 3

 

[JohnCuse44]

Let the meltdown begin!

 

[jncuse]

I said this months ago; as long as we're in the East I don't care if we're a 1, 2 or 3

But if we are a 3 it's impossible for us to get in the east. Either Duke or Virginia is getting a 2.

Plus we would need some more What moments to get a 3.

 

[PoppyHart]

Let's be realistic. If UVA wins the conference tourney they get MSG, as either a 1 or 2, even if we go 4-1 down the stretch.

 

[Chris02M]

Let's be realistic. If UVA wins the conference tourney they get MSG, as either a 1 or 2, even if we go 4-1 down the stretch.

Memphis is closer than msg I believe for Virginia and Virginia isn't getting a 1 seed

 

[jdubs30]

But if we are a 3 it's impossible for us to get in the east. Either Duke or Virginia is getting a 2.

Plus we would need some more What moments to get a 3.

Well I was saying months ago. But at this point I'd rather ahve a 2 in the East than a 1 in the West

 

[ROCuse]

Let's be realistic. If UVA wins the conference tourney they get MSG, as either a 1 or 2, even if we go 4-1 down the stretch.

If we finish 4-1 in the above scenario that would mean losing to UVA in the ACC championship game. We would get a one seed.

 

[gilardino]

If kansas loses tonight, the who is the 1 seed?

 

[hoopsupstate]

If Grant doesn't get healthy, then it's all academic. Our offense is anemic enough and without Grant it's pathetic.

 

[Chris02M]

If kansas loses tonight, the who is the 1 seed?

your looking at him baby

 

[pearl31]

Let's be realistic. If UVA wins the conference tourney they get MSG, as either a 1 or 2, even if we go 4-1 down the stretch.

You're wrong.

 

[pearl31]

Just have to stay ahead of Duke.

 

[ROCuse]

You're wrong.

Seriously. We'd be 30-4 with losses @ #5 Duke, @ #12 UVA, the ACC championship game, and one What BC loss.

 

[PoppyHart]

Seriously. We'd be 30-4 with losses @ #5 Duke, @ #12 UVA, the ACC championship game, and one What BC loss.

You're wrong.

Nope

 

[PoppyHart]

Seriously. We'd be 30-4 with losses @ #5 Duke, @ #12 UVA, the ACC championship game, and one What BC loss.

And why in that scenario would we have preference over a UVA team that would have beaten us twice?

 

[ROCuse]

And why in that scenario would we have preference over a UVA team that would have beaten us twice?

Well we'd have one less loss to start. Also better non conference wins.

 

[rocfan44]

If Kansas loses, will we move back up to a 1 seed?