Dave85
Living Legend
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2013
- Messages
- 10,122
- Like
- 14,329
I think this "it's just my opinion" defense gets stretched a bit far. First, folks are just as entitled to have an opinion that another's opinion is illogical or mean spirited.
Illogical and mean spirited is an opinion. It's not a defense to have an opinion. I'm just saying just because someone thinks Malachi should have stayed another year is just that. People argue it like you are an a hole for having a contradictory opinion.
Second, and particular to this topic, some of the opinions on this thread have been exactly that. I could provide multiple examples but will offer one - "we need to start recruiting kids who want to be here". That was actually written on this forum.
In other words, Richardson is the wrong kind of person to recruit to Syracuse and we should not recruit people like him in the future.
You are mixing statements. The idea "start recruiting kids bla bla bla" has nothing to do with having an opinion on whether it was a good decision for Malachi to leave. Surely you do not believe everything who thinks Malachi should have stayed also think we should only recruit kids that want to be here. They have nothing to do with each other.
Whether that is someone's honest opinion or an immature reaction to something that did not go as they wished (ding ding ding) is besides the point. To me, that is illogical, mean spirited, and completely unfair to a great kid who represented Syracuse well on and off the court. I don't think immunity attaches bc someone claims that's just my opinion.
There's never a reason for ad hominem attacks like "immuature reaction". This is exactly what I talking about. Just because someone has a different opinion you don't like means that they MUST be immature? Or they must be illogical? Or they are mean spirited? What's wrong with just saying, "I don't agree with your opinion" and leave it at that?
Last edited: