two3zone
RIP Shark58
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2013
- Messages
- 70,189
- Like
- 78,513
I’m sure Le Moyne wouldn’t mind hosting us.We need to really get some road games scheduled at Incarnate World
I’m sure Le Moyne wouldn’t mind hosting us.We need to really get some road games scheduled at Incarnate World
Ha. I guess you're right. It seems like forever and a day since we got in so I really haven't followed NET or other criteria very closely. I was thinking about something similar just the other day. I haven't watched a non-syracuse basketball game in a loooong time. For me, there isn't any purpose. I used to like to watch other teams and root for our interests. Lately, it just hasn't mattered.It is a long time since committee announced that they switched from RPI to NET. Since then there is no new announcement, we can assume NCAA keeps using NET to evaluate teams.
I doubt we would ever play at LeMoyne (no matter what the NET implications are). But I'm sure they would be happy to play in the Dome.I’m sure Le Moyne wouldn’t mind hosting us.
Actually brilliant, it would be a road game blowout with a home crowd there and no travel. Univ has to forego the ticket income though.I’m sure Le Moyne wouldn’t mind hosting us.
Or call it a Le Moyne home game, they needed the dome to house the crowd for the road team.I doubt we would ever play at LeMoyne (no matter what the NET implications are). But I'm sure they would be happy to play in the Dome.
This buy game would fund most of their athletic department for the year.
It makes too much sense not to happen.
Could bring the Carrier Classic back too lolActually brilliant, it would be a road game blowout with a home crowd there and no travel. Univ has to forego the ticket income though.
Do we have any analytics people on our staff? Seems that we’re Syracuse University, we should be on the cutting edge of applying analytics to our sports teams.So I guess the advanced metrics having Bama so highly rated early in the season may have been onto something.
Sounded like the calculations with the NET weren’t known equally by all. In addition some OOC games are set up sometimes years ahead of time so there’s a time element involved in trying to maximize analytics in a timely fashion.Do we have any analytics people on our staff? Seems that we’re Syracuse University, we should be on the cutting edge of applying analytics to our sports teams.
During the selection show the announcers stated that Clemson’s road win in November @ Alabama was the best out-of-conference with by any ACC team, so out of 165 games. So even with Alabama slipping in the AP poll towards the end of the year, their metrics were still strong. And as you stated, we see that the NET got at least that one right. Of course, many others can certainly be questioned. Nothings perfect unfortunately.So I guess the advanced metrics having Bama so highly rated early in the season may have been onto something.
yeah and at least they earned it to some degree by playing an insane OOC schedule (Purdue, Arizona, Creighton, Clemson, Oregon, Ohio State) as opposed to those Big 12 bums destroying the worst teams in D1So I guess the advanced metrics having Bama so highly rated early in the season may have been onto something.
Sounded like the calculations with the NET weren’t known equally by all. In addition some OOC games are set up sometimes years ahead of time so there’s a time element involved in trying to maximize analytics in a timely fashion.
Post in Progress
1. Iowa 30.8 (6)
2. Pitt 30.6 (7)
3. Oklahoma 27.1 (8)
4. St. John's - 26 (7)
5. Ohio St - 26 (5)
6. Villanova - 24.5 (6)
7. Butler - 23.4 (7)
8. Wake - 23.2 (6)
9. UCF - 23.1 (8)
10. Miami - 23.0 (7)
11. Utah - 22.8 (5)
12. Minnesota - 22.6 (9)
13. Virginia Tech - 22.2 (6)
14. Maryland - 21 (7)
15. Cincy - 20.3 (9)
16. Seton Hall - 19.1 (9)
17. LSU - 18.9 (8)
18. Rutgers - 18.6 (7)
19. Providence - 18.3 (11)
20. Washington - 18.3 (4)
21. Oregon St - 17 (6)
22. Penn St - 16.3 (6)
23. Xavier - 16.3 (8)
24. Oklahoma St - 16.0 (7)
25. USC - 16.0 (5)
26. Georgia Tech - 15.3 (3)
27. Boston College - 15 (7)
28. Kansas St - 13.8 (5)
29. Florida St - 12.6 (5)
30. UCLA - 12.3 (6)
31. Indiana - 12.2 (6)
32. Georgia - 12.2 (6)
33. Stanford - 11.4 (5)
34. Michigan- 11.3 (3)
35. Arkansas - 10.9 (7)
36. Arizona St - 9.8 (4)
37. Ole Miss - 9.6 (7)
38. Syracuse - 9.3 (4)
39. Georgetown - 9.1 (9)
40. Vanderbilt - 8 (5)
41. Louisville - 7.8 (6)
42. Notre Dame - 4.7 (6)
43. California - 4.3 (4)
44. Depaul - 2.7 (6)
45. West Virginia - 2 (4)
Margin of victory over Q4 opponents, and how many Q4 games played.Before I include analysis behind the numbers (there are some limits to the data), can anybody take a guess at what this list of 45 teams, for which Syracuse ranks #38, represents?
Correct .. for the 45 “P6” teams that missed the tournament.Margin of victory over Q4 opponents, and how many Q4 games played.
Maybe.
I think, not sure, that some are series set up ahead of time but not with specific time nor dates set while others are late fillers set up later right before the season begins. I recall Syracuse starting a series with Georgetown in addition to having some big preseason tournament participation known at least a year before hand. The specifics seem to be set up late but the fact we will be playing is known earlier.I thought basketball schedules were made in the offseason, not years ahead. That was always true of football schedules, (and I never knew why: it's all about phone calls and now E-Mails).