What was the poll?
This matches my experience with Matt. I've only listened to him a couple times as I watched on tv because I couldn't believe he was as bad as the board indicated. As a radio announcer, he really needs to paint the picture for his listeners and his canvas definitely has some blank spots where we need more details. If you have tv to accompany his call, it's ok. But if you are solely depending on him for what's going on, it's not good at all.I like Matt a lot, but he drives me crazy in football. He gives colorful descriptions of plays, but he does that and then gives the result almost as an afterthought. I have him on the radio with the TV sound down, (our posters are always complaining about the Tv announcers, so I don't think I'm missing much), and it kill me when he says somebody slipped a tackle on third and three and doesn't say if he gets the first down and I can see on Tv that he did. If I tried to just listen to Matt on the radio, I'd have little idea what was going on.
Listening to him for the Georgetown game was painful, had no clue what was going onThis matches my experience with Matt. I've only listened to him a couple times as I watched on tv because I couldn't believe he was as bad as the board indicated. As a radio announcer, he really needs to paint the picture for his listeners and his canvas definitely has some blank spots where we need more details. If you have tv to accompany his call, it's ok. But if you are solely depending on him for what's going on, it's not good at all.
There is a member of this board who can do the job!Right? How hard is it to tell people what you see. He didn’t even say the Syracuse offense was on the field.
We’re a broadcasting school. There are 10 seniors at Newhouse who could do better.
But but but, he teaches some of the classes. He must be good.Right? How hard is it to tell people what you see. He didn’t even say the Syracuse offense was on the field.
We’re a broadcasting school. There are 10 seniors at Newhouse who could do better.
Personal opinion is he has a problem but that’s a very big thing to say without evidence.I've been wondering if something is going on.. he looks awful when he does his on camera stuff. I know he had that DUI years back but just in general he looks rough and disheveled these days. Clearly the quality of his work is a mess to go with.
Personal opinion is he has a problem but that’s a very big thing to say without evidence.
Duh, that's why I listed to WAERRight? How hard is it to tell people what you see. He didn’t even say the Syracuse offense was on the field.
We’re a broadcasting school. There are 10 seniors at Newhouse who could do better.
Wes is great.On the subject of announcers, I thought that the ESPN PBP announcer (Wes Durham) definitely has a SU bias. I had assumed he was a Newhouse grad, but apparently he's just an ACC guy.
Also, while the importance of the missing SU players was discuused, maybe I missed it but I don't recall any mention of the recent departure of our OC and DC.
I like Matt a lot, but he drives me crazy in football. He gives colorful descriptions of plays, but he does that and then gives the result almost as an afterthought. I have him on the radio with the TV sound down, (our posters are always complaining about the TV announcers, so I don't think I'm missing much), and it kills me when he says somebody slipped a tackle on third and three and doesn't say if he gets the first down and I can see on TV that he did. If I tried to just listen to Matt on the radio, I'd have little idea what was going on.
Love WesOn the subject of announcers, I thought that the ESPN PBP announcer (Wes Durham) definitely has a SU bias. I had assumed he was a Newhouse grad, but apparently he's just an ACC guy.
Also, while the importance of the missing SU players was discuused, maybe I missed it but I don't recall any mention of the recent departure of our OC and DC.
So stupid, just needs to learn to keep his unfunny comments to himself.Could be worse:
On the subject of announcers, I thought that the ESPN PBP announcer (Wes Durham) definitely has a SU bias. I had assumed he was a Newhouse grad, but apparently he's just an ACC guy.
Also, while the importance of the missing SU players was discuused, maybe I missed it but I don't recall any mention of the recent departure of our OC and DC.
Similar to John Sterling but at least Sterling's excuse is he's 80+ yrs old.I don’t know how the university can continue to employ him as the lead of the flagship broadcast.
It’s absolute embarrassing.
He had no idea who had the ball after the 12 men call.
Then actually verbally debated kicking deep versus onside.
Then just broke out in laughter after the Clark penalty call.
Listeners had no idea what was going on.
And I only listened to the final 2 min of the game. God knows what happened earlier.
It’s a disgrace.