yesSo does this say more about the depth at DB or RB, or that McFarlane wasn't picking up the defense, or that the coaches decided they needed another potential playmaker on offense?
back at RB
Dukes sez hi!
back at RB
NO! It has to mean there's something wrong with the team!!! Everything must be a sign that our program is headed in the wrong direction!Isn't it also possible MacFarlane was unhappy with being on D and asked to be moved to RB?
It means that, since the OL can't open holes (against stacked defenses) for a ground'n'pound guy like Smith, maybe we need someone in the backfield who has the talent to make it a little more interesting.
Well personally I'd prefer a kid be moved to help the team than be moved because he's unhappy. Call me crazy but that seems more negative and detrimental to me.NO! It has to mean there's something wrong with the team!!! Everything must be a sign that our program is headed in the wrong direction!
MOar NeGAtiViTY!!!111!!! I neeeds it!!!
I get the coaches thinking with Smith and AAM but IMO I don't think it can work in this system. Those guys need the OL to open holes on a consistant basis. IMO Broyld, PTG, and Morris are all better fits for what we run. IMO we need quicker guys who can adjust to what is happening in front of them. However IMO PTG is only good for maybe a dozen carries a game and Morris is very raw right now. I think he will be good but I am not sure if he is ready for this season, or at least until BE play. IMO Broyld is a good fit for what we are trying to run. I can see him becoming like Daniel Thomas, who was also a QB/Athlete out of HS that turned into s 6'3 230 stud RB.
. Ditto, ... More negatives lets keep the half empty crowd HAPPY!NO! It has to mean there's something wrong with the team!!! Everything must be a sign that our program is headed in the wrong direction!
MOar NeGAtiViTY!!!111!!! I neeeds it!!!
NO! It has to mean there's something wrong with the team!!! Everything must be a sign that our program is headed in the wrong direction!
MOar NeGAtiViTY!!!111!!! I neeeds it!!!
True. But he also said we are too deep at safety and DVM wouldn't play there. So...again, half-empty/half-full.Fwiw, Marrone said it was because of the lack of separation at the rb position in the scrimmage Saturday.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Marrone said. “We have a lot of competition back at the safety position. We didn’t think Devante would be involved in that.”
True. But he also said we are too deep at safety and DVM wouldn't play there. So...again, half-empty/half-full.
My post was in reference to the many posters on this board who insist on always seeing the glass as half full.Well it is Marrone that is half empty/half full then.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2