JeremyCuse
Renowned lacrosse analyst
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 41,722
- Like
- 54,436
Different SOS numbers:
Syracuse has the best/most quality wins and 2nd best RPI
Different SOS numbers:
Different SOS numbers:
Funny from Quint.
We beat two of these our bubble teams head to head and have better computer numbers than them.
I feel like they are just putting us on that list to have a discussion point.
For Jeremy is better to be the 8 and potentially play Penn State second round or be unseeded and on the other side of the bracket.
Towson got the AQ and Syracuse got the last seed. No need to apoligize!!!!Solidly Uninformed and Moronical. Congrats.
Towson got the AQ and Syracuse got the last seed. No need to apoligize!!!!
I suggest all
(1) read the NCAA Selection Criteria
(2) try to read and comprehend correctly what the page accurately says
The Criteria is based on RPI, SOS and Quality Wins and Losses. For example, Cornell is ahead of Syracuse because their rankings are: 12, 1 and 8 whereas Syracuse is 10, 9 and 12. That means Syracuse has a better RPI but Cornell has a tougher schedule and better quality wins. All three count. The committee does not have head-to-head as a primary criteria.
At present this is the probable order of at-large assuming Yale and Penn State get the AQ
(1) Duke
(2) Virginia
(3) Loyola
(4) Penn
(5) Cornell
(6) Notre Dame
(7) Maryland
(8) Hopkins
(9) Syracuse
Only 8 get in so to guess which ones the Committee will select, you need to examine the RPI, SOS and QW rankings. If two teams are very close for the last at-large selection, the committee examines secondary criteria.
.
Towson got the AQ and Syracuse got the last seed. No need to apoligize!!!!
Hopkins got the last at large. You were in need of medical help regarding Cornell. Other than that, not awful.