Hoo's That
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2013
- Messages
- 25,477
- Like
- 68,099
Sure, I eagerly welcome the day when the SEC and Big XII decide the recruiting rules for the NCAA's replacement.Can we just boot the NCAA, asking for a friend...
Sure, I eagerly welcome the day when the SEC and Big XII decide the recruiting rules for the NCAA's replacement.Can we just boot the NCAA, asking for a friend...
California schools aren't paying more than SEC schools even with this legislation. This was a football move. California hasn't been a factor nationally for about a decade.
I believe it’s supposed to sink in the pacific first.Just waiting for the state to float off into the Atlantic...cant happen soon enough!
The real problem for California would be the schools in the remaining 49 states. 49 states v. California. Unless California can convince a few other key states to do likewise, they will have less bargaining power. Non-California teams can refuse to play California schools based on the perceived or real advantage. The four key California schools (let's be honest, the other 54 really do not matter) do well enough without the law. Besides, the remaining PAC12 schools may not like the California schools having an advantage.
Not sure what will happen, but it will be amusing to watch.
I mean the schools can never pay players directly it would have to be the tv/conferences doing it. First off from the players perspective these non profits would immediately become masters at making it look like they weren’t making any profit even if with 100k people in the stands. Give players the TV money and let the schools keep the ticket revenue. Defer most of it until graduation they can wait a few years and just leave school with a big check to use on a house etc.
Honestly it’s probably time for football and basketball to no longer subsidize sports like field hockey. Title 9 will have to go bye bye. Non revenue sports can just be club teams for all I care it’s no less relevant than it is now they can use the varsity facilities and play teams that are bus rides away etc etc.
New York should follow
So it can float off in the Pacific?
Title IX can’t just be ignored. It’s a law. Perhaps if the gop controls Congress and the White House, but there’s no way the Democrats would ever support repealing.
The California law doesn’t require the schools to pay. It simply affirms the right to profit off of your work for your celebrity.
Just waiting for the state to float off into the Atlantic (Pacific) any body of water far away...cant happen soon enough!
So I guess you'll get womens hoops. Which is fine. I think football is exempt but there will be some sport to offset that.
I think D1 hoops and football would both be better products if the players walked away with a 6 figure check upon graduation (and didn't get it until completing their degree.) Moneys gotta go somewhere why subsidize sports noone cares about vs giving it to the guys on the field.
Exact opposite. It's why Syracuse has 11 women's teams and 7 men's. (Want to make it clear that I do not have a problem with this.)I thought football was exempt from Title IX.
Well there's actually rules that don't allow them to go pro in the most profitable leagues right out of high school so maybe we should find some middle ground here. This is the only group of people anyone can think of off of the top of their head who can't make money off their own name and likeness so I'm inclined to think the kids we root for every season should be able to benefit off of that. But that's just my opinionJust go pro...please. I cheer for name on the front of the jersey.
Easy to change those rules. If kids want money, play for pay in the pros. It’s not for college to line their pockets.Well there's actually rules that don't allow them to go pro in the most profitable leagues right out of high school so maybe we should find some middle ground here. This is the only group of people anyone can think of off of the top of their head who can't make money off their own name and likeness so I'm inclined to think the kids we root for every season should be able to benefit off of that. But that's just my opinion
The NCAA will likely challenge this in court and (as much as I dislike the institution's ridiculous enforcement policies) is probably pretty sanguine about its chances. Aside from the constitutional issues (interstate commerce), federal appellate courts have repeatedly upheld the NCAA's amateurism model.Easy to change those rules. If kids want money, play for pay in the pros. It’s not for college to line their pockets.
Easy to change those rules. If kids want money, play for pay in the pros. It’s not for college to line their pockets.
We all know the equation is not as simple as your argument. While I have no issue with kids getting a cut from sales of merchandise with their name or likeness, schools do pay the kids with a free education, assuming the kids actually go to class (UNC is obviously excepted as are SEC schools).So the colleges can line their own pockets selling jerseys with a kid's number on it? Stores like Shirt World or Manny's can sell "Carmelo" tshirts and make money off the kids. Everyone can make money off the kids except the kids.
All three with no/low academics and lots of talent.My guess is the SEC states will follow quickly. Especially Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi.