Garbs
All Conference
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2011
- Messages
- 2,510
- Like
- 1,046
lolThat argument doesn't fly. The NBA picks it's players by more than just skillset. RJ was better last year than Donte Greene ever was. Yet, who's in the NBA?
lolThat argument doesn't fly. The NBA picks it's players by more than just skillset. RJ was better last year than Donte Greene ever was. Yet, who's in the NBA?
Any argument that involves the phrase "Arinze Onuaku did not really have an offensive game" reveals such a fundamental lack of understanding of basketball that it cannot be taken seriously.
He was best at shooting free throwsI love AO as much as the next guy but come on he was a one trick pony. Anyone who cannot take a normal face the basket jump shot has no offensive game
I love AO as much as the next guy but come on he was a one trick pony. Anyone who cannot take a normal face the basket jump shot has no offensive game
with all due respect . . . you don't know What you are talking about
name them? I see you did a good job naming the exception, but let's hear all these playersLike Shaq?
There are plenty of offensively-skilled post players who cannot reliably hit face-up jumpers. That's usually not their role within the offense.
not better than the ones he will practice with in the NBAEveryone thought Sullinger was gone last year. He was one of the top 3 bigs in the country.
Melo could do some major damage next year. Play even more minutes, work in a spread offense, and probably play next to some better rebounders and a true PF.
I would rather be dead wrong and Say "Melo is gone right now".
name them? I see you did a good job naming the exception, but let's hear all these players
yet you can't name anyGosh, pick an NCAA starting center. Maybe ten percent of them are even adequate face-up shooters, but a much larger number would qualify as "offensively skilled."
For sure, CJ will start over Southerland -- but JS might well get minutes over Rak, unless Rak makes a lot of progress year over year.With a starting lineup of MCW/Triche/Southerland/Rak/DC2 and a bench of Cooney/Fair/Keita/Grant. I see us alot like Ohio State this year, just bigger and more athletic. Definately think we have a top 10 championship caliber team.
*Fair could start over Southerland ...
with all due respect . . . you don't know What you are talking about[/q
...Why not??
I think we will be ok. We have pieces that fit together and are ridiculously talented. MCW is the type of pg who can bring it together imo. I just dont get how a frontline of CJ/Rak/DC2 works. If CJ can shoot the three then ok, but if not its so much congestion inside the 3 point line. On the flip side if we cant rebound with those 3 guys in the game at the same time I will lose my mind!For sure, CJ will start over Southerland -- but JS might well get minutes over Rak, unless Rak makes a lot of progress year over year.
As to whether this is a top 10 team, you have to respect what we lose in Kris, Scoop, Dion & Melo. That would be the defensive player of the year, and the 3 guys on the team who have dribble-drive abilities. Those were the four who garnered Big East honors. We will be very raw in the backcourt (apart from BT) and raw inside (apart from CJ).
This season, we thrived on the development of our sophs -- would need similar or bigger leaps year over year by MCW, Rak and Cooney. Not impossible to reload, but you saw what happened this year in the Big East to teams that lost a lot of the experience that carried them the previous year.
I think right now the main lineup for next year is CJ/JS/DC2 with Rak/BMK off the bench. Rak has a lot of improvement to do just to increase his minutes.I think we will be ok. We have pieces that fit together and are ridiculously talented. MCW is the type of pg who can bring it together imo. I just dont get how a frontline of CJ/Rak/DC2 works. If CJ can shoot the three then ok, but if not its so much congestion inside the 3 point line. On the flip side if we cant rebound with those 3 guys in the game at the same time I will lose my mind!
because you are claiming that Arinze was not a dominant big man and that all he scored on were, to quote, "simple put backs." You could not have watched the 2009-10 season and come to that conclusion - Arinze had a well developed low post game for three seasons and his senior capped it as probably the best - or certainly among the five best - low post scorers in America. The 2010 team built its offense around Arinze. Every game - and I mean literally every game - began by pounding the ball inside to Mr. Automatic. This then opened up the entire floor for the rest of the team. Even though he played the fewest minutes of any of the main rotation players, Arinze had the second highest shot percentage and only trailed Wes by a few percentage points for highest offensive rating . . . and that was on the squad with the highest team offensive rating in the Pomeroy database - even higher than the offensive juggernaut built around Carmelo Anthony.
because you are claiming that Arinze was not a dominant big man and that all he scored on were, to quote, "simple put backs." You could not have watched the 2009-10 season and come to that conclusion - Arinze had a well developed low post game for three seasons and his senior capped it as probably the best - or certainly among the five best - low post scorers in America. The 2010 team built its offense around Arinze. Every game - and I mean literally every game - began by pounding the ball inside to Mr. Automatic. This then opened up the entire floor for the rest of the team. Even though he played the fewest minutes of any of the main rotation players, Arinze had the second highest shot percentage and only trailed Wes by a few percentage points for highest offensive rating . . . and that was on the squad with the highest team offensive rating in the Pomeroy database - even higher than the offensive juggernaut built around Carmelo Anthony.
A "dominant" Big man dont just avg 10pts and a measely 5 rebounds?? I like AO but lets be real most of his points were wide open dunks or soft one handed floaters that bounced in time to time. Your not dominant grabbing just 5 boards. But the point is we could possibly have two maybe three very good inside players that are skilled and should get touches and the offense ran through them esp if we have Melo and DC.
raw averages are for simpletons, because they do not normalize for minutes played nor possessions used.
Arinze's numbers were seemingly low because he played on such a balanced squad. The fact of the matter is that when he got a touch on an offensive possession, he was dominant on the blocks. And, fwiw, his offensive rebound percentage was 11.5, just a notch below Fab's 11.8