not even on lunardi's radar?? | Page 2 | Syracusefan.com

not even on lunardi's radar??

jdubs30 said:
Lundari was just on ESPN2 -- it's clear he thinks we have no shot to get in.

I really hope it's just an anti-Syracuse sentiment from him as opposed to "inside information" as some have speculated

Thats what im afraid of. Does he know something we dont know? If cuse gets in it would be hard to take this guy serioualy ever again.
 
Briancuse said:
I think St Joes is in the 8/9 game.

I know. I was trolling bpo but he didn't bite.
 
Lundari was just on ESPN2 -- it's clear he thinks we have no shot to get in.

I really hope it's just an anti-Syracuse sentiment from him as opposed to "inside information" as some have speculated

If lunardi had any insider information, he'd be a lot more accurate than he is on a yearly basis.
 
Thats what im afraid of. Does he know something we dont know? If cuse gets in it would be hard to take this guy serioualy ever again.
it's just bizarre and frightening to me. It just feels like he got word from someone before the Pitt game that we had to win that and would not be considered if we lost.
But it does give me a very uneasy feeling right now
 
Why would the committee leak it to him, and if your one of these bracketologists and you are getting help from the committee, your cred goes down the drain.
 
Why would the committee leak it to him, and if your one of these bracketologists and you are getting help from the committee, your cred goes down the drain.
sure, if it were to be exposed - but neither Joey/mothership or the committee are going to spill those beans
 
it's just bizarre and frightening to me. It just feels like he got word from someone before the Pitt game that we had to win that and would not be considered if we lost.
But it does give me a very uneasy feeling right now
I think before the Pitt game that probably was the case. No one foresaw 95% of everything we needed to go our way happening.
 
I think before the Pitt game that probably was the case. No one foresaw 95% of everything we needed to go our way happening.
no, but like I said, it was just decided that was it for Syracuse, regardless of what happened after Wed. That is how Lunardi has gone with it and he has been so resolute with it that I just can't grasp why/how
 
no, but like I said, it was just decided that was it for Syracuse, regardless of what happened after Wed. That is how Lunardi has gone with it and he has been so resolute with it that I just can't grasp why/how

Because he is a fat toad who hates our program.
 
If lunardi had any insider information, he'd be a lot more accurate than he is on a yearly basis.
Not necessarily. He could be like that kid who purposely changes some answers from the kid he's copying to not attract attention.
 
Katz is the reporter, he thinks we're in. He'd get the insider information before Lunardi does.
 
Pac12 overrating continues - Cal is not a 4, and Colorado is a really weak 8
 

Forum statistics

Threads
170,424
Messages
4,890,818
Members
5,996
Latest member
meierscreek

Online statistics

Members online
247
Guests online
1,153
Total visitors
1,400


...
Top Bottom