CbusCuse
All Conference
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 3,020
- Like
- 5,529
Tell me where I said we were looking for another starter at LB or looking for someone who is a current starter on another Power 5 program. Point is, a guy who got zero playing time at LB in his second Sophomore season at "lowly Rutgers" is likely not a target for us at this point. IF...we target any transfer LB, its a higher upside player who knows they have a real shot to start in 2023 and was good enough to see the field this past year in some capacity. And coming from a P5 isn't a requirement.Sure, difference of opinion and perspective
Are we looking to add more LBs? If so I agree it is probably not someone who will be projected to be a starter here since we have good trio, so your not likely to get a starter from another power 5 program to come here. Which means, who are you gonna get? A power 5 reserve? A group of 5 starter or reserve?
As for ripping on Rutgers, sure go ahead but we look kinda silly doing it. I try to post based on reality vs delusion, results and stats vs narrative. Carry on and War Otto
And there are not many NCAA football fans out there that would think saying "lowly Rutgers" is delusional. The people and posts your are addressing are not delusional. In a way, I kind of understand what your perspective is, but in response to this thread was not the time to try to make a point on this issue.