two3zone
RIP Shark58
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2013
- Messages
- 68,761
- Like
- 73,520
My guess is they were overly cautious with UNLVs secondary.Yeah definitely - perspective is key.
My guess is they were overly cautious with UNLVs secondary.Yeah definitely - perspective is key.
I think most likely we were more prepared in case UNLV had adopted Stanford's strategy. Stanford rushed the passer early and it is working and those early points eventually got them the win. NFL QB has only 2.5 seconds for the screen pass. McCord did not do that in early Stanford game. Not his fault, more on coaching staff not prepared for it. You cannot rush passer in the whole game. Once the opponent sees it is working, they will seek other strategy. But in Q1, you have to force your opponent change.A lot of those short passes / screens were part of the RPO game. McCord usually makes the right read but he definitely threw a few that should have been handed off.
I agree with this. If they are gonna give you 7, 8, 10 yards at a pop due to soft coverage it’s hard to ignore that and not take it. They may have just decided we’d have to beat them with the short stuff. And we did.You take what the defense gives. We hit a deep cross to OG I think in the 4th. But with gill and Hatcher you don’t have guys that can separate from defenders. It’s not just speed, it’s route running too.
Throwing is better than running. It's sacrilege to say it. But that's what it comes down toMcCord is 2nd in the country in passing yards per game. He is 59th in yards per attempt. And has a 64% competion %.