Oregons' advantage totally unfair | Syracusefan.com

Oregons' advantage totally unfair

GooseMutt

All Conference
Joined
Oct 13, 2016
Messages
3,812
Like
6,657
Knight owner of Nike, has donated over 300 million to Oregon Sports programs over recent years. This is just so ridiculously unfair in terms of recruiting advantages. The facilities they offer must be out of this world. How many CTO s would we need to match that. Blows my mind and nothing anyone can do about that.
 
Knight owner of Nike, has donated over 300 million to Oregon Sports programs over recent years. This is just so ridiculously unfair in terms of recruiting advantages. The facilities they offer must be out of this world. How many CTO s would we need to match that. Blows my mind and nothing anyone can do about that.
Why is that unfair? Would a hundred big donors offering $3M each be more fair? I think the inherent advantages of state schools re: access to capital through budgets is more inequitable...but private schools could all drop out and have their own org if they wanted.

Regardless, there's big money in college sports. Not news. Also not a guarantee of success (see Texas everything and Oregon fb this year)
 
Knight owner of Nike, has donated over 300 million to Oregon Sports programs over recent years. This is just so ridiculously unfair in terms of recruiting advantages. The facilities they offer must be out of this world. How many CTO s would we need to match that. Blows my mind and nothing anyone can do about that.

At the end of the day, they have zero national titles in football or basketball since FDR's presidency.
 
Knight owner of Nike, has donated over 300 million to Oregon Sports programs over recent years. This is just so ridiculously unfair in terms of recruiting advantages. The facilities they offer must be out of this world. How many CTO s would we need to match that. Blows my mind and nothing anyone can do about that.
& yet this was their 1st Final Four since 1939 & they've never brought in a top 5 rated hoops class. Facilities aren't everything.
 
he's also committed 500 mil for science and academic facilities. and this is a bad thing how ?
as an alumni he's to be applauded imo.

Never said it was a bad thing and yes he should be applauded. I am simply jealous and it seems like there would be a huge advantage vs avg college program. I think he's a great guy. He also gave Stanford a lot of money
 
is he the heir to that tremendous 70's cologne empire ? and would he be a one time booster or could we count on him for multiple contributions to launch us into the future ?

il_570xN.340457343.jpg
 
is he the heir to that tremendous 70's cologne empire ? and would he be a one time booster or could we count on him for multiple contributions to launch us into the future ?

il_570xN.340457343.jpg

Two words: Nicely scented electric golf carts.
 
is he the heir to that tremendous 70's cologne empire ? and would he be a one time booster or could we count on him for multiple contributions to launch us into the future ?

il_570xN.340457343.jpg

The good news is he would build us an amazing new $300M athletic dorm. The bad news is it would be in a tunnel under a volcano or on an asteroid.
 
Ha. My Alma Mater got $1.4 billion, yes billion with a b, from one alum. None of it went to sports, though.
 
Knight owner of Nike, has donated over 300 million to Oregon Sports programs over recent years. This is just so ridiculously unfair in terms of recruiting advantages. The facilities they offer must be out of this world. How many CTO s would we need to match that. Blows my mind and nothing anyone can do about that.
This is exactly why the "paying the players will destroy parity!" arguments are so delusional.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
175,318
Messages
5,349,147
Members
6,233
Latest member
SUtoga

Online statistics

Members online
312
Guests online
6,768
Total visitors
7,080


Top Bottom