donniesyracuse
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 8,909
- Like
- 14,680
Randle averaged 6.7 yards per carry in limited action last season. I would have been in favor of giving Murray more rest. Despite being a Princeton graduate, Jason Garrett has a tendency towards old school-meathead thinking.TheCusian said:We'll see. I don't remember his back up being lights out last year. (If anyone can run back there - why didn't they spell Murray more?)
He had 58 rec and 3 tds. 15 of those catches were in 1 meaningless end of season game against the skins. Take away that game and he's at 3 or 4 catches a game, in that high powered chipper offense.Curious take on Zach Ertz not panning out considering he's only entering his third nfl season and coming of a statistically identical season to Jason Whitten.
He had 58 rec and 3 tds. 15 of those catches were in 1 meaningless end of season game against the skins. Take away that game and he's at 3 or 4 catches a game, in that high powered chipper offense.
some of the greatest statistical games are played in week 16 and 17. That's just how it is.Are the Redskins in the NFC East? Why, yes, yes they are. So Ertz torched the Redskins. While the game didn't impact the standings, that doesn't mean the game is meaningless, even if you say it is. The 'Skins have to account for Ertz. 58 catches is a good number, especially in an offense that spreads things around. Brett Celek will likely take on more of a blocking role, and Ertz' stats will likely improve. Unlike, say, Mark Witten's. Age is a great equalizer.
Don't get me wrong. It's not as if any of this is a slam-dunk for the Eagles. But I think you're not being realistic in your assessment of the quality of Ertz, or the impact he could well have this year. What, exactly, do you see in the current state of the Redskins' secondary to make you think that they will not be vulnerable to a pass-catching TE going forward?
Demarco murray is also a season removed from a very bad leg injury.
Demarco murray ran behind a top 3 o line last year, now he goes to the Eagles with some serious questions on the o line.And Tony Romo is a season removed from a serious injury. Seriously, you're just throwing bleep up on the wall now. Oh, and Tony Romo no longer has Demarco Murray.
Oh and BTW I'm not saying he didn't deserve those 15 receptions, but just take that game out of the equation and give him 5 receptions and hes at average numbers. plus he only had like 115 yards that game.Are the Redskins in the NFC East? Why, yes, yes they are. So Ertz torched the Redskins. While the game didn't impact the standings, that doesn't mean the game is meaningless, even if you say it is. The 'Skins have to account for Ertz. 58 catches is a good number, especially in an offense that spreads things around. Brett Celek will likely take on more of a blocking role, and Ertz' stats will likely improve. Unlike, say, Mark Witten's. Age is a great equalizer.
Don't get me wrong. It's not as if any of this is a slam-dunk for the Eagles. But I think you're not being realistic in your assessment of the quality of Ertz, or the impact he could well have this year. What, exactly, do you see in the current state of the Redskins' secondary to make you think that they will not be vulnerable to a pass-catching TE going forward?
Demarco murray ran behind a top 3 o line last year, now he goes to the Eagles with some serious questions on the o line.
Oh and BTW I'm not saying he didn't deserve those 15 receptions, but just take that game out of the equation and give him 5 receptions and hes at average numbers. plus he only had like 115 yards that game.
along with mathis.Birds had one of the best o-lines in the league last year. They've gotta replace Todd Herremanns, who was injured for part of the year and is 32. Peters and Johnson are one of the best OT tandems in the league. Serious questions? Questions, yes. Serious? Not hardly. I honestly don't understand why you're engaging in such hyperbole.
Mark whiten had a cannon for an arm. Remember going to Chiefs games and him gunning down folks at the plate.Unlike, say, Mark Witten's. Age is a great equalizer.
This is wishful thinking on your part. The Cowboys were obviously prepared to move on from Murray. They reportedly made their token $5 million/year offer and did not budge. If they wanted him, they would have made it happen.Symphony Steve said:Jerry Jones recognizes that the window is closing, both for Romo and for himself. That's why I think a move made out of panic is imminent.
Mark whiten had a cannon for an arm. Remember going to Chiefs games and him gunning down folks at the plate.
There is no question that Murray is stud. The Eagles are now going to have a very physical runner to compliment Kelly's offense.
The gamble for Philly is that there have been only five runners in league history who have surpassed the 400-carry mark for a season. That list includes Eddie George, James Wilder, Jamal Anderson, Eric Dickerson and Larry Johnson. The problem associated with that elite company is what happened to them after their 400-carry seasons. Aside from Dickerson, every other runner in that group became significantly less productive in subsequent years.
Murray became too expense for the Cowboys to take that risk. But, they absolutely wanted him back.
yeah, and how does that work out for them??I get that a lot.
yeah, and how does that work out for them??
usually uttered just once...
The Eagles better hope it works out better.
I married into an Eagles family, so I do laugh a little at the "this was Chip's plan all along". Wasn't Frank Gore the plan until he didn't want to go there?
ha! gore was the plan.The Eagles better hope it works out better.
I married into an Eagles family, so I do laugh a little at the "this was Chip's plan all along". Wasn't Frank Gore the plan until he didn't want to go there?