Clearly the answer is to name 60 or 70 guys to the 50 Greatest list. Why should that list be limited to 50 guys? Just like having a 10 man All Conference team.
Agreed - I didn't think they should've bumped Clyde Drexler for him as the writer suggested. Also, rather than bump people off, I'd rather they add 20 spots for the 20 years later. I know that's kind of a cop out, but I feel like it's a way to honor history without trying to compare generations too much.