We're playing 9 guys...5 of them have never played a single game in orange before this season.
There's talent.
But it takes time to jell as a team to be good enough to beat good teams.
Whatever happens against Wisconsin, we'll be all right...especially after we beat the #$!&%^ out of UConn and G-town.
You guys are crazy. One loss and bubble talk? We are ninth in Kenpom rating. Talk about overreaction Monday. Just get better and everything else will take care of itself.
This board could give a psych prof. fodder for a years worth of classes.
Any hardcore sports board could.
You guys are crazy. One loss and bubble talk? We are ninth in Kenpom rating. Talk about overreaction Monday. Just get better and everything else will take care of itself.
But if we win - a win at Wiscy is more impressive than beating A&M and UCANT on neutral floors last year. This win would be big come tourney time if we are in the position to need it.if we dont beat wisconsin. we better not be on the bubble. last year beating uconn and a&m in atlantis basically got us in the tourny, this year we'll have nothing.
He's actually correct - our OOC sked will be w/o any key wins should we lose tonight, as UConn, Gtown, and SJU look to be crap run-over 50x. However, it only becomes relevant if we have a mediocre record in conference. We would have no margin for error in that scenario.
You mean a loss to a ranked team? Not sure how losing to South Carolina hurts us, they are good and will contend in the SEC.Exactly, don't want to speak for the poster, but I thought his point was pretty clear. If we ended up in bubble territory, the loss to some SEC team would hurt us. But he's not predicting that we'll be on the bubble.
You mean a loss to a ranked team? Not sure how losing to South Carolina hurts us, they are good and will contend in the SEC.
They have beaten 3 good teams (Us, Monmouth, and Michigan). That is 3 quality non-conference wins. They will finish 1st or 2nd in the SEC and likely be above 20 wins again this year more than likely they are in the 22-25 range. They also returned their best players. They are a tournament team, and no way they don't win 20 games in their conference.Contend for what, second place?
It's early - we don't know how good they are. It's like clockwork, every year conventional board wisdom is that some Virginia Tech or California is going to be a fantastic team in their conference by virtue of having played a good game against SU. Then they end up 18-13 and the people who made those claims (and only saw 40 minutes of that team all season) are nowhere to be found.
For SC, we'll see. They played tenacious defense against a very accommodating opponent, and they're in a crappy league. Maybe they're really good. If they wind up a ranked team, we'll all be happy about that.