Class of 2024 P Coleman Franzone (SC) PWO Offered

[orangemass]

It looks like Fran wants competition at PK, punting, and even long snapping. Having a scholarship is not immunity from being bypassed.

I think Fran saw stonehouse in the bowl game and wasn’t sold

 

[CuseLegacy]

 

[AngryOtto]

He’s a take just because of his name.

 

[PhatOrange]

I think Fran saw stonehouse in the bowl game and wasn’t sold

That’s absurd. For starters it was pouring rain. Secondly Stonehouse is one of the top punters in the country. I think his average is top 20. 18 inside the 20, 19 of 50+, and only 5 tbs.

 

[SuFTW]

Recruited by Vollono when he was at Troy.
A quick look through his Twitter shows lots of college visits. I wonder if he is holding out for a scholarship offer.

 

[Capt. Tuttle]

This is a must sign name

Huge NIL potential in Syracuse

 

[tep624]

Recruited by Vollono when he was at Troy.
A quick look through his Twitter shows lots of college visits. I wonder if he is holding out for a scholarship offer.

If he doesn't really care about where he lands that's what I'd be doing - waiting on a scholarship offer. the PWO offers will probably be there still somewhere.

 

[orangemass]

I think his numbers are deceiving. He was wildly inconsistent in my opinion. Time will tell if Fran agrees

That’s absurd. For starters it was pouring rain. Secondly Stonehouse is one of the top punters in the country. I think his average is top 20. 18 inside the 20, 19 of 50+, and only 5 tbs.

 

[SuFTW]

I think his numbers are deceiving. He was wildly inconsistent in my opinion. Time will tell if Fran agrees

Fran is not making a decision on who the punter will be based on a few miss kicks from last year. We need a backup up punter regardless if Stonehouse was perfect or not.

 

[PhatOrange]

I think his numbers are deceiving. He was wildly inconsistent in my opinion. Time will tell if Fran agrees

How can his numbers be deceiving? He’s a punter, and he had 67 punts. His numbers are black and white.

 

[A Clockwork Orange]

I think his numbers are deceiving. He was wildly inconsistent in my opinion. Time will tell if Fran agrees

Statistical fact: not true. My opinion: true. Sorry orangemass, I just thought it was a funny juxtaposition!

 

[wfschrec]

Statistical fact: not true. My opinion: true. Sorry orangemass, I just thought it was a funny juxtaposition!

I do remember him hitting a few bad punts, when our field position was God awful during critical points in a couple games. Stats don’t always tell the whole story. For example a guy may bat .300 in the MLB but is batting .350 with the bases empty but only .200 with runners on the bases. I think we extrapolate the inconsistency by remembering a handful of moments due to their significance instead of remembering the entire body of work.

 

[A Clockwork Orange]

I do remember him hitting a few bad punts, when our field position was God awful during critical points in a couple games. Stats don’t always tell the whole story. For example a guy may bat .300 in the MLB but is batting .350 with the bases empty but only .200 with runners on the bases. I think we extrapolate the inconsistency by remembering a handful of moments due to their significance instead of remembering the entire body of work.

I have no problem with Orangemass and his take; I just thought it was a funny line. Stonehouse was fine this year; every college punter will have bad moments. We sometimes believe these guys should be perfect and, frankly, don't watch many other college football games with the vigor we watch the Orange with.

Every fanbase can tell you horror stories about their punter or placekicker, but that's pretty much universal, which is why we use statistics to rate these guys, not the objective opinions of fans. And listen - I get that stats can be bent to the whim of the person making the argument, but Stonehouse did pretty well for most of the year as the stats bear out.

 

[wfschrec]

I have no problem with Orangemass and his take; I just thought it was a funny line. Stonehouse was fine this year; every college punter will have bad moments. We sometimes believe these guys should be perfect and, frankly, don't watch many other college football games with the vigor we watch the Orange with.

Every fanbase can tell you horror stories about their punter or placekicker, but that's pretty much universal, which is why we use statistics to rate these guys, not the objective opinions of fans. And listen - I get that stats can be bent to the whim of the person making the argument, but Stonehouse did pretty well for most of the year as the stats bear out.

Oh I agree, I was just hypothesizing around how one could arrive at that perspective.

 

[CuseLegacy]

Surprised to see a punter get offered given Stonehouse has two more years.

Either it is a PWO offer or this guy is a helluva punter.

He is ranked as the #6 punter in the country by a punting site so probably the latter….

He's a PWO and a helluva punter.

 

[orangemass]

I do remember him hitting a few bad punts, when our field position was God awful during critical points in a couple games. Stats don’t always tell the whole story. For example a guy may bat .300 in the MLB but is batting .350 with the bases empty but only .200 with runners on the bases. I think we extrapolate the inconsistency by remembering a handful of moments due to their significance instead of remembering the entire body of work.

Exactly