newmexicuse
All Conference
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 3,662
- Like
- 8,108
Stupid penalties by us. Out of bounds hit turned the game. No call by the ref on the shrader out of bounds play. Bad interference call on clemson’s last drive.
Stupid penalties by us. Out of bounds hit turned the game. No call by the ref on the shrader out of bounds play. Bad interference call on clemson’s last drive.
His right foot hit inbounds when the hit came. That was a gift call for Clemson. Its clear in the replayStupid penalties by us. Out of bounds hit turned the game. No call by the ref on the shrader out of bounds play. Bad interference call on clemson’s last drive.
Thats the NCAA income call. Without that call Clemson loses and the NCAA loses a bunch of money by not having Clemson in tue CFPAs someone that doesn't watch much of the college football - what was wrong with Fuentes hit?
Are you not allowed to hit the QB if he seems to be willingly on his way out of bounds? On the replays it looked like his last step before contact was still inbounds - could be wrong on that though I suppose. Just curious.
It was clearly a late hit by us. Just dumb. Refs got that one correct.As someone that doesn't watch much of the college football - what was wrong with Fuentes hit?
Are you not allowed to hit the QB if he seems to be willingly on his way out of bounds? On the replays it looked like his last step before contact was still inbounds - could be wrong on that though I suppose. Just curious.
It was clearly a late hit by us. Just dumb. Refs got that one correct.
No. Almost. That was a ACC income call. The NCAA doesn't need Clemson in the final four. But the ACC does.Thats the NCAA income call. Without that call Clemson loses and the NCAA loses a bunch of money by not having Clemson in tue CFP
It was clearly a late hit by us. Just dumb. Refs got that one correct.
Was upset about that at the time. 4th and 3 isn't 4th and 1.It started with the three points off the board on the opening drive.
You take points where you can get them.
If we did that it was 27-24, and we just needed a FG
I don't think he was out of bounds either.I'm sure still shots will show up but I didn't think the QB was OB. Flashbacks to the NW game years ago.
What was clear was GS being OB after getting rid of the ball. You can call both or you can call neither but you can't no call the more blatant and call the other.
That said ACC refs always gonna ACC ref. We shouldn't have given them the chance to matter.
I don't think he was out of bounds either.
I'm sure still shots will show up but I didn't think the QB was OB. Flashbacks to the NW game years ago.
What was clear was GS being OB after getting rid of the ball. You can call both or you can call neither but you can't no call the more blatant and call the other.
That said ACC refs always gonna ACC ref. We shouldn't have given them the chance to matter.
We had other bad penalties, several holdings, and the motion penalty on that funky looking third and one play. One of the holdings negated a beautiful first down throw by Garrett.
a very winnable game that we blew.
We aren't that good that we can beat a team like Clemson at Clemson by a large margin. There are going to be calls. And if they aren't straight, and they never are there, it just makes it too tough.I'm sure still shots will show up but I didn't think the QB was OB. Flashbacks to the NW game years ago.
What was clear was GS being OB after getting rid of the ball. You can call both or you can call neither but you can't no call the more blatant and call the other.
That said ACC refs always gonna ACC ref. We shouldn't have given them the chance to matter.
But Clemson out of the CFP is a loss to the NCAANo. Almost. That was a ACC income call. The NCAA doesn't need Clemson in the final four. But the ACC does.
Not that much. Two sec schools and Ohio st. The other team can be almost anyone. They weren't hurting last year without them. The ACC on the other hand, and it is ACC refs, they lose a lot if Clemson isn't in.But Clemson out of the CFP is a loss to the NCAA