PFF Grades | Pitt | Syracusefan.com

PFF Grades | Pitt

Offensive grades vs. Pittsburgh (min/10 snaps)​

PlayerPositionOffensive GradePass-block grade
1LeQuint AllenRB71.4
2Max MangTE67.4
3Garrett ShraderQB62.6
4Chris BleichRG61.086.3
5J'Onre ReedC59.782.4
6Dan VillariTE59.3
7Mark PetryRT59.281.3
8Isaiah JonesWR58.9
9Enrique Cruz Jr.LT58.285.5
10Umari HatcherWR56.4
11Juwaun PriceRB52.3
12Joe CruzLG51.881.6
13Damien AlfordWR51.6
14Donovan BrownWR47.7
 

Defensive grades vs. Pittsburgh (min/10 snaps)​

PlayerPositionGrade
1Kevin Jobity JrDE76.2
2Leon LoweryEDGE72.1
3Kevon DartonDT72.0
4Isaiah JohnsonCB71.5
5Jayden BellamyCB70.7
6Marlowe WaxLB68.1
7Stefon ThompsonLB67.6
8Braylen IngrahamDL67.0
9Derek McDonaldLB66.4
10Terry LockettDL64.0
11Caleb OkechukwuDL63.1
12Justin BarronS60.8
13Elijah Fuentes-CundiffDL60.6
14Alijah ClarkS58.8
15Anwar SparrowLB53.7
16Jason Simmons Jr.S52
 
Someone has to explain this to me. I’ve been told 60 is the benchmark/replacement level.

Villari below 60 is criminal. I don’t care about the fumbles. Dude averaged 11 yards per carry. Maybe I don’t understand the metric
 
Someone has to explain this to me. I’ve been told 60 is the benchmark/replacement level.

Villari below 60 is criminal. I don’t care about the fumbles. Dude averaged 11 yards per carry. Maybe I don’t understand the metric

60 is average. Pff looks at everything like it or not. It looks at the whole picture. I’m sure what hurt his grade is that for fumbling he scored an 18. For passing he was in the 30s. I’m sure those two things dragged his score down.
 
Someone has to explain this to me. I’ve been told 60 is the benchmark/replacement level.

Villari below 60 is criminal. I don’t care about the fumbles. Dude averaged 11 yards per carry. Maybe I don’t understand the metric
Metrics are good but don’t tell the whole story. As someone said above, I look at the “eye test”.
 
I wonder how they metric a 3 yd run.. some are better than others.

3/5 for 12.. but again you can only do what the play calls for.. if the play is 5 throws behind the line and they all go for -5 thats not a qb issues.. He missed the 1 throw to Allen and the other Shrader ran OB.

I mean look at QBR Shrader was 1/2 and the 1 was a wounded duck. he gets a 91 and Vallari gets a QBR of 12.
 
I wonder how they metric a 3 yd run.. some are better than others.

3/5 for 12.. but again you can only do what the play calls for.. if the play is 5 throws behind the line and they all go for -5 thats not a qb issues.. He missed the 1 throw to Allen and the other Shrader ran OB.

I mean look at QBR Shrader was 1/2 and the 1 was a wounded duck. he gets a 91 and Vallari gets a QBR of 12.

QBR puts a lot of weight on TDs and INTS. So I’m sure shraders TD helped a lot.
 
I find it interesting that the oline pass block grades are so high but the overall oline grades are pretty meh despite us running for so many yards.
 
Someone has to explain this to me. I’ve been told 60 is the benchmark/replacement level.

Villari below 60 is criminal. I don’t care about the fumbles. Dude averaged 11 yards per carry. Maybe I don’t understand the metric
I call trash on this crap. Dan should have been a 1000. Its why i dont think these grades are worth much.
 
Pass blocking grades. lol.

It was the 100-year game.
Beck just wanted to fashion a game plan that was modeled after football in the 1920’s, when forward passes were frowned upon.
 
Pass blocking grades. lol.

We only passed 8 times but how was the blocking on those 8 plays? That’s what gets graded.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
170,622
Messages
4,902,047
Members
6,005
Latest member
CuseCanuck

Online statistics

Members online
254
Guests online
1,382
Total visitors
1,636


...
Top Bottom