JeremyCuse
Renowned lacrosse analyst
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 41,334
- Like
- 52,943
Not at all, but Marc Brownstein brings the untzIs he reputable?
There is no real Fiscarelli. His twitter profile was changed from covering DePaul to covering Syracuse now lol
Thanks for sharing. A refreshing perspective by the kid to make his moment, his.Just so everyone knows. He has not informed any staff at any school of his decision. He said to all involved “making my decision at the announcement”. Hence why no movement.
4pm ESTSorry to ask but when exactly is he announcing
this afternoon.Sorry to ask but when exactly is he announcing
Lol yes it originally said Depaul, guy is a total fraud.
yep it did - he/someone changed itI swear it said "Covering DePaul Hoops" earlier today
Thank you4pm EST
Thanksthis afternoon.
CousCous is just messing with everyone.yep it did - he/someone changed it
CousCous is just messing with everyone.
impressive
impressive
Exactly what SU needs.I watched the game which is the 3rd time I’ve watched a complete game of his. His strength is that he does everything well, plays under control, and is athletic as hell.
Real interested to see what transpires in the next couple hours. But one thing for sure, is that I am not going to hit the refresh a million times.I watched the game which is the 3rd time I’ve watched a complete game of his. His strength is that he does everything well, plays under control, and is athletic as hell.
I'll take 10 of those.Exactly what SU needs.
Yeah I am lucky that I have a meeting to head to in about a half hour, and it should last through his announcement. so I will have either good or bad news when I get back to my desk.Real interested to see what transpires in the next couple hours. But one thing for sure, is that I am not going to hit the refresh a million times.
Who knew! All it takes is pushing.seems the conman is continuing his con... or is it a con???
View attachment 216130
And no one from here has called him out yet? Shameseems the conman is continuing his con... or is it a con???
View attachment 216130