OrangeDW
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2012
- Messages
- 65,363
- Like
- 200,435
Expected to compete like Denver wasn't ? Denver was just as good after the trade. Knicks would be better off losing next year to get into the lottery and have the ability to sign two -three stars next offseason.
If the Knicks sign Melo for 20 million per year or more it will be looked at as a bad contract by everyone except the people here.
Melos best chance of winning is being someone else's side kick. Whether that is Lebron or someone else. Melo cannot be the lead man on a championship team. He hasn't proven to have that ability yet. 3 playoff series wins in 11 seasons is not a solid stat in his favor.
Complete BS. To my knowledge Denver hasn't been to the conference finals since the trade, so no they were not just as good after it. Melo got DENVER to the conference finals. That doesn't happen. He also had them in the playoffs every single year. That franchise had not had any relevancy whatsoever since friggin Alex English played.
Melo also gave the Knicks their best season in 15 years, dragging an awful roster to 54 wins and the 2nd round. Minor miracle.
He hasn't led a team to a championship because he's walked into two franchise that were God Awful for 10 years before he arrived, and who didn't really make the moves to build around him right.
If the Knicks sign Melo to a 20 million contract, you're right...many will say it's a bad move. However, many of these were the same people spouting off about Paul George being better than Melo. (You sound like one of them, am I right?). Remember when that was a thing? Move on to the next one, and keep taking the legit, made top guys for granted because they aren't superman.