Point fixing scheme about to break | Page 2 | Syracusefan.com

Point fixing scheme about to break

It makes sense that these are mid-major teams. If I was a Henry Hill-type trying to fix a basketball game, I would want it to be for a team that is extremely under the radar with as few national eyeballs as possible.
Precisely. Much easier to do this with less visible teams and with players who aren’t making big money.
 
Just pushing back on you a bit. If you are 100% certain there are more than a handful of referees are corrupt and involved in point shaving, I’m assuming you have direct evidence to support your claim.

Or are you just being hyperbolic for the sake of your position on the matter?
But, but... refs made calls against my team that I didn't like!!
 
The irony, if you read the indictment details, is that they often lost their bet even with the designated players underperforming as promised but the overall point spread still got covered.

If I were so inclined, why would I bother to bet on a TEAM's performance when I can bet on an individual player's performance
which is guaranteed to pay off.
 

Games involving the following teams were allegedly rigged or impacted, investigators say: Western Michigan University, Butler, St. John's, Tulane, East Carolina, McNeese State, Nicholls State, St. Louis University, Duquesne, La Salle, Fordham, SUNY Buffalo, Kent State, Ohio University, Georgetown and DePaul.
Aren't a number of those Big East schools, and wouldn't some players on those teams have to be involved? And if so wouldn't those teams end up being banned from tournaments, also wins that players were involved in taken away, because of their participation?
 
The irony, if you read the indictment details, is that they often lost their bet even with the designated players underperforming as promised but the overall point spread still got covered.

If I were so inclined, why would I bother to bet on a TEAM's performance when I can bet on an individual player's performance
which is guaranteed to pay off.
I would think that betting on an individual player's performance (taking the under) is more risky than betting on the team. If there was a significant amount bet on a player, that would likely raise eyebrows.
 
giphy.gif
 
Kevin Bacon was in "A Few Good Men" with JT Walsh.

Walsh was in "Blue Chips" with James Arthur Boeheim.

The Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon.
Most iconic lines in movie history:
"Here's looking at you, kid." -Humphrey Bogart
"I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse." -Marlon Brando
"Too many bad shots." -Jim Boeheim
 
It makes sense that these are mid-major teams. If I was a Henry Hill-type trying to fix a basketball game, I would want it to be for a team that is extremely under the radar with as few national eyeballs as possible.
I agree but I wonder if that makes it easier to get caught - how much is wagered on these level games? I would think $50 would raise a flag.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
175,862
Messages
5,272,050
Members
6,191
Latest member
OldBartman

Online statistics

Members online
283
Guests online
4,465
Total visitors
4,748


P
Top Bottom