Two of my favorite movies are from 1939. That’s 30-ish years “before my time.” Not sure why you’d want to ignore movies just because they were made before you were born. What about paintings/art? Modigliani and Rembrandt were before your time. What about Hemingway and Fitzgerald and cummings. What about the bible/Torah/Qur’an/et al?
How do you say pre-1970s films are before your time but you’ve already watched and liked The Honeymooners? I don’t understand the whole post!
It is interesting how different eras perceive time and vintage and their associated values. The younger the viewer, more likely the more ‘content‘ of that person’s era there was to consume. So, people who are 15 today have always had internet and YouTube and cable/satellite/streaming. Thats a lot of contemporary media to go through and they may not see value in ‘going back’ to primitive content (4:3, black and white, simple/practical FX).
But, when I was a kid, we had three main tv channels and fuzzy UFH, and the stuff we watched after school was ‘old‘ and ‘before our time’—Tom and Jerry, The Three Stooges, Ultraman…. I watched The Stooges so much that the 1930s were as familiar to me as the 70s. And even though I didn’t think about it then, now I appreciate the beauty of that aesthetic. The pre-plastics I call it….