Props to Bullough/Adjustment | Syracusefan.com

Props to Bullough/Adjustment

anomander

Living Legend
Joined
Nov 30, 2012
Messages
16,141
Like
32,692
Great job by Bullough switching to almost exclusive press man coverage. The first 2 drives CMU moved the ball down the field with Cuse playing their soft cover 2. After that he seemed to realize his db's had the advantage against their wr's and went to press man while sending at least 2 of the LB's on almost every snap. Nice adjustment. There was no way CMU's wr's were going to beat us.
 
I'm encouraged by his ability/willingness to make the adjustment during the game. And the defense looked a lot more sound today (though our cornerbacks don't appear to have great ball awareness).
 
I'm encouraged by his ability/willingness to make the adjustment during the game. And the defense looked a lot more sound today (though our cornerbacks don't appear to have great ball awareness).

My only concern going forward is the ACC will have wr's who can get open and make plays. We will probably go back to a lot of the zone that got picked apart the first couple drives. I literally think we blitzed every single play the last 3 quarters.
 
My only concern going forward is the ACC will have wr's who can get open and make plays. We will probably go back to a lot of the zone that got picked apart the first couple drives. I literally think we blitzed every single play the last 3 quarters.

Agree. I thought Reddish would be a lot better by this point. Hope we see some improvement.
 
I m afraid we are going to have to wait a year or two before the DBs can really cover the better ACC WRs.
 
I m afraid we are going to have to wait a year or two before the DBs can really cover the better ACC WRs.

See I don't think it's the cb's fault. When they are getting passes completed against them it's almost exclusively when we are in some sort of zone and the receiver has a big cushion. They are pretty good in straight man.
 
See I don't think it's the cb's fault. When they are getting passes completed against them it's almost exclusively when we are in some sort of zone and the receiver has a big cushion. They are pretty good in straight man.
Sure, but you can't win if they play that loose in zone. We will just give up too much chunk yardage against a good passing attack. Shafer used to play some match-up zones that worked better. It just seems like we are willing to wait until the field shrinks in the red zone. Drives me nuts.
 
Sure, but you can't win if they play that loose in zone. We will just give up too much chunk yardage against a good passing attack. Shafer used to play some match-up zones that worked better. It just seems like we are willing to wait until the field shrinks in the red zone. Drives me nuts.

I think that's more on the DC then the cb's though. Just look at how they did when they were in almost exclusive man from the 2nd quarter on.
 
Defense looked like Va Tech against Ohio State. LEGIT.

However, I want to see us lock down a running QB before I get too amped up.
 
No idea for the life of me why CMU didn't run any type of screen or bubble pass against our constant blitz. The blitz was killing them, but we know we're pretty good against pocket passers. We need to get better against mobile QB's. Good day from the D though, they made plays.
 
Great job by Bullough switching to almost exclusive press man coverage. The first 2 drives CMU moved the ball down the field with Cuse playing their soft cover 2. After that he seemed to realize his db's had the advantage against their wr's and went to press man while sending at least 2 of the LB's on almost every snap. Nice adjustment. There was no way CMU's wr's were going to beat us.
Except for Jesse Kroll, of course, who looked like Tyler Eifert against us --- 5 receptions for 86 yards, and a 17+ per catch average. In a closer game he would have given us fits ... our secondary got bailed out by the D-Line, and lots of LB blitzing, or Kroll would have done more damage.
 
Except for Jesse Kroll, of course, who had a nice game against us --- 5 receptions for 86 yards, and a 17+ per catch average. In a closer game he would have given us fits ... we got bailed out by the D-Line, and lots of blitzing, or Kroll would have done more damgage.

I know he had that one big catch in the 2nd half over Morgan, despite good coverage, but i'd like to know how many of those catches/yards came after 1st quarter.

But like Clev04 said we know we can stop run oriented teams with a immobile qb. We need to show we can make adjustments to stop those mobile qb's, and spread offenses. Personally i'd like to see more press man coverage. imo that's where we are at our best.
 
See I don't think it's the cb's fault. When they are getting passes completed against them it's almost exclusively when we are in some sort of zone and the receiver has a big cushion. They are pretty good in straight man.

I'm not sold yet on the DBs ability to cover, but I agree they did look better today in press coverage, and they do seem to play better in man.

They have not faced a lot of speed yet this year. Starting next week, they are going to see WR with speed and playing making every week. It will be interesting to see how they hold up. I think Bullough will continue to send the house. I hope that they will continue to use press coverage and just take their chances that the rush will get there.
 
I agree. Press coverage and blitz. If we give up some big plays so be it but I feel that's our identity and our defense plays better that way. Va Tech was able to blitz a mobile QB to death against Ohio State. It can be done.
 
I agree. Press coverage and blitz. If we give up some big plays so be it but I feel that's our identity and our defense plays better that way. Va Tech was able to blitz a mobile QB to death against Ohio State. It can be done.

The problem with blitzing a mobile QB is that you need the speed to get there...
 
I just want to point out how disgustingly good Crume has been so far this year. No he isn't Jay Bromley but damn has he been great for us in the middle, and a nonstop motor in the pass rush, I know he forced the fumble on the scoop and score, but I'm pretty sure he had another effort sack as well.
 
Agree. I thought Reddish would be a lot better by this point. Hope we see some improvement.
I think expectations were kind of unfair there. Everybody talked about Reddish being this great shut down corner pretty much as soon as he started playing. He's solid, but shut down corners are a rare animal.
 
I think expectations were kind of unfair there. Everybody talked about Reddish being this great shut down corner pretty much as soon as he started playing. He's solid, but shut down corners are a rare animal.

I'm afraid I used the words "Kevin" and "Abrams" -- together, no less -- to describe his potential toward the end of his sophomore year.

Expectations were probably high.

Still wish we'd see a little more out of him. This team is going to need to force a lot of turnovers to have a successful season; the defensive backs could chip in here.
 
I saw basically the same D as last week except this time CMU's qb was too slow to evade the rush. When he could he usually had guys pretty wide open. Glad we won but I don't know how this translates to playing a better team. Plan A is blitz every play and there seems to be no plan B. If CMU had thrown some screen passes I don't know what would happen.

We needed the win and I am glad we got it but I am still very concerned about the D. This game could be a mirage.
 
I'm afraid I used the words "Kevin" and "Abrams" -- together, no less -- to describe his potential toward the end of his sophomore year.

Expectations were probably high.

Still wish we'd see a little more out of him. This team is going to need to force a lot of turnovers to have a successful season; the defensive backs could chip in here.

He plays really conservative, especially when were in a zone. He gets a lot of passes completed in front of him, but I can't recall too many occasions where he has been beaten 1 on 1 over the top.
 
Great job by Bullough switching to almost exclusive press man coverage. The first 2 drives CMU moved the ball down the field with Cuse playing their soft cover 2. After that he seemed to realize his db's had the advantage against their wr's and went to press man while sending at least 2 of the LB's on almost every snap. Nice adjustment. There was no way CMU's wr's were going to beat us.

Agreed. The Syracuse Defense owned this game. After the first series, the Chips didn't know what hit them. Loved the pressure and the contain - this is the defense I was expecting to see week 1. Great job and hope to see a lot more of it.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
176,280
Messages
5,305,323
Members
6,198
Latest member
Cuseman73

Online statistics

Members online
55
Guests online
6,433
Total visitors
6,488


P
Top Bottom