I think you need to be thoughtful about it. You want to create competition but what you also don't want to do is overload the depth chart and have a revolving door of backups. I think we have a pretty healthy depth chart now, but we're still a little heavy at the FR/RF level. Lamson/Morgan/Markiewicz/MacPhail are all technically freshman right now, and then Shrader is a Soph. An upperclassman dual threat who isn't coming to start would be ideal for next season. We could use an insurance policy who has a decent number of game reps already.From this logic we should take 1 quarterbacks every other cycle who transfer out from the factory schools and one high upside HS QB each cycle.
I think you need to be thoughtful about it. You want to create competition but what you also don't want to do is overload the depth chart and have a revolving door of backups. I think we have a pretty healthy depth chart now, but we're still a little heavy at the FR/RF level. Lamson/Morgan/Markiewicz/MacPhail are all technically freshman right now, and then Shrader is a Soph. An upperclassman dual threat who isn't coming to start would be ideal for next season. We could use an insurance policy who has a decent number of game reps already.
I think you need to be thoughtful about it. You want to create competition but what you also don't want to do is overload the depth chart and have a revolving door of backups. I think we have a pretty healthy depth chart now, but we're still a little heavy at the FR/RF level. Lamson/Morgan/Markiewicz/MacPhail are all technically freshman right now, and then Shrader is a Soph. An upperclassman dual threat who isn't coming to start would be ideal for next season. We could use an insurance policy who has a decent number of game reps already.
It would be nice if once of these last 4 games is a blowout in our favor so we can Morgan in game running the "Shrader" offense and see how he does with it. That will answer a lot of questions.Yeah, but - how do you sell that role to said "insurance policy" guy?
Who comes here thinking they just wanna compete to be QB2?
Shrader was told he could compete to be QB1, and he eventually achieved that.
He looks deceptively fast, those couple of scrambles he was outrunning defensive backs. I really like this kid for our offense.A few scrambles towards the end:
I don’t see any video on his hudl of him running the ball but he does a nice job of avoiding hits in the pocket and can roll out. I would like to see his running ability as well.
Great size too at 6’5 220, built like a linebacker.
I don’t quite get it either. Only thing I could think was level of competition. You’d think at least some of the G5 west/mountain schools would be recruiting him.Am I missing something with this kid? I am no football expert, but this kid is 6-5, 220…in high school as a QB. Has a really good arm and can scramble a bit. How is this kid not getting recruited by big time schools? I would be pumped if we land this kid, he looks legit
If he commits I’ll watch a game too. Live in Carlsbad, good HS football in San DiegoHe’s got a 3.8 GPA too. The level of competition is quite good here. Hoping to get to a playoff game as he plays just a few miles from my house.
We don’t necessarily need a guy who’s excessively mobile, we just need one that can move if he needs to and has situational awareness. An improviser type.Stylistically, kinda reminds me of Big Ben. Size, good arm, pass first, but not a statue and can move when needed.
Id love to see committed to next to his thread titleWould appear he’s visiting this weekend - would be nice to lock him up.
Sorry, I can't do that until it happens.Id love to see committed to next to his thread title
just slide in the pocket when its needed worked out pretty well for Brady and Manning.We don’t necessarily need a guy who’s excessively mobile, we just need one that can move if he needs to and has situational awareness. An improviser type.