So it wasn't a question when it was handed to Konrad. I don't think anybody questioned it very much, as it was the coaches' decision. Could David Walker have worn the number? Yes, but he didn't and it was available. Instead, it was used to entice Terry Richardson from Florida.
We all know Jim Brown was given the number, not by a coach, but by the equipment manager. Fourteen people wore the number prior to him, and most were WR or Offensive Linemen. Heck, JB wasn't even the first RB to wear it. It was what JB did while wearing that number that helped cement it's legacy. He was not a choir boy, but he was principled and strong willed in the face of adversity. What he did with it after that also matters. He, at the coaches request, offered it to Ernie Davis. We know what Davis did wearing it, but he also did one more thing... offered it to Floyd Little. A passing of the baton. A challenge to the next guy to advance the legacy. These guys did not wear it in successive years. Each one had a player after them that was not Jim Brown or Ernie Davis, etc. That is important to note. the number was used even when it wasn't worn by a prospective Heisman candidate.
That's really the point here. It is an imperfect thing, and that doesn't take away from its lore, it enriches it. It exemplifies catching lightning in a bottle, and if you want to do that, you're going to have to weather the storm. Nobody or no thing is perfect. We should not remove the chance for greatness out of fear of failure.
While at SU I went to a lecture by Henry Rollins. One of the greatest things he said that night (and for the record he is an increadible speaker and motivator) was that we can't afford to be awed by people, we instead must be inspired by them. To me that is what 44 means, and that seems to be what Robert Washington is allowing the prospect of 44 do for him. That is why this seems a very appropriate awakening of the lighting in the bottle.