I think you pay too much attention to my posts. It's creepy.
Well, I do usually read all the posts on the board, I know if somebody is complaining about a referee it's probably you.
you're one of the clowns that always defends the refs, I take it?
I don't defend them, but I don't blame them for our bad play.
yeah, this thread was totally about SU.
Oh, wait...
The clemson guy ran over a Duke guy and fell down, that isn't a foul. I don't think Hood was fouled either.
I'm talking about the other 2,000 posts you've made on here.
not sure why hood's drive was considered a foul and the last clemson drive wasn't.
sure thing, skippy.
stalk someone else now, please. here are some candidates for you:
http://syracusefan.com/threads/duke-56-clemson-53-3-minutes-to-go.71907/#post-985704
that's the point. Hood shouldn't have gone to the line, down 1, with 3.8 seconds to go.
Clemson's wasn't. No idea if Hood's was as unless I missed it, they refused to show a single replay? In an era where they replay everything under the sun 10x over?
Hood at least was in some sort of control and threw the ball up. Don't go 90 feet in 3 seconds and not shoot.
Glad I left that game right when it started.
You're not real sure about things, are you?lol
And that, precisely, is the point of this thread.both dudes were driving into the lane out of control. duke shoots 2 and clemson doesn't.
Nah. The Paul Harris looking kid went in there like a Paul Harris looking spaz and just jumped.
No foul.