According to the commissioner's office, hitting a batter is worse than throwing your helmet at a player?
Stupid.
He tried to hit the pitcher with the helmet, but he's too stupid to understand where to release it.
Assuming the guy did mean to throw at him or hit him, big deal. That's been part of the game for a century. It happens all the time without a meltdown and thrown helmets and punches. No way the pitcher acted worse than the batter.
He threw at him because he hit two homers off him almost three year ago...bush league...and oh, also because he doesn't like Harper...which seems like you don't as well...Even his own teammates waited a few seconds before running in there, they knew it was ridiculous...
He tried to hit the pitcher with the helmet, but he's too stupid to understand where to release it.
Assuming the guy did mean to throw at him or hit him, big deal. That's been part of the game for a century. It happens all the time without a meltdown and thrown helmets and punches. No way the pitcher acted worse than the batter.
You're right about that. I don't like him, think he's trashy.
But what the pitcher did isn't unusual. It wasn't dirty or dangerous - the pitch was at his hip. The only thing that was remarkable about this was the batter's meltdown. And it's the latest in a pattern of that kind of behavior from him.
The fact that throwing a baseball 95+ MPH at a person isn't considered dangerous, unusual, or dirty is kind of crazy to me.
Depends on the situation, in this case I would say it was dirty...
Not only by hitting Harper did Strickland risk injuring Harper and as result maybe himself as Harper charged him...but he put his teammates at risk for injury in the brawl that followed as result of them having to run in to defend him...all because almost three years ago, on their way to winning the WS, he didn't pitch well enough and gave up 2 homers to Harper..
Guess I'm on an island on this one.
Pitchers hit batters. Deliberately. Weekly. Whether he's throwing 88 or 98 doesn't matter, and I don't think his assumed justification (home runs years ago) does either. In baseball, pitchers throw at batters and it's not usually a big deal. It only becomes a noteworthy situation when the brain-dead child in the batter's box has a meltdown. Given that, it's weird that his suspension is lighter than the suspension of the pitcher who didn't act outside the bounds of what's normal in the game.
Guess I'm on an island on this one.
Pitchers hit batters. Deliberately. Weekly. Whether he's throwing 88 or 98 doesn't matter, and I don't think his assumed justification (home runs years ago) does either. In baseball, pitchers throw at batters and it's not usually a big deal. It only becomes a noteworthy situation when the brain-dead child in the batter's box has a meltdown. Given that, it's weird that his suspension is lighter than the suspension of the pitcher who didn't act outside the bounds of what's normal in the game.
Guess I'm on an island on this one.
Pitchers hit batters. Deliberately. Weekly. Whether he's throwing 88 or 98 doesn't matter, and I don't think his assumed justification (home runs years ago) does either. In baseball, pitchers throw at batters and it's not usually a big deal. It only becomes a noteworthy situation when the brain-dead child in the batter's box has a meltdown. Given that, it's weird that his suspension is lighter than the suspension of the pitcher who didn't act outside the bounds of what's normal in the game.
Guess I'm on an island on this one.
Pitchers hit batters. Deliberately. Weekly. Whether he's throwing 88 or 98 doesn't matter, and I don't think his assumed justification (home runs years ago) does either. In baseball, pitchers throw at batters and it's not usually a big deal. It only becomes a noteworthy situation when the brain-dead child in the batter's box has a meltdown. Given that, it's weird that his suspension is lighter than the suspension of the pitcher who didn't act outside the bounds of what's normal in the game.
Guess I'm on an island on this one.
Pitchers hit batters. Deliberately. Weekly. Whether he's throwing 88 or 98 doesn't matter, and I don't think his assumed justification (home runs years ago) does either. In baseball, pitchers throw at batters and it's not usually a big deal. It only becomes a noteworthy situation when the brain-dead child in the batter's box has a meltdown. Given that, it's weird that his suspension is lighter than the suspension of the pitcher who didn't act outside the bounds of what's normal in the game.
I strongly disagree. Throwing at guys is absolute crap and an embarrassment to the sport.But what the pitcher did isn't unusual. It wasn't dirty or dangerous - the pitch was at his hip.
Remember when Cole Hamilton I think intentionally beaned Harper way back when, because Harper had the audacity to play well at the major league level at a young age?Yeah, I don't agree. You don't get to just fire fastballs at people on purpose with no Repurcussions. Baseball has the weirdest unwritten rules, many of which are in support of overly sensitive, butthurt pitchers.
Remember when Cole Hamilton I think intentionally beaned Harper way back when, because Harper had the audacity to play well at the major league level at a young age?
Garbage.
Yeah, I don't agree. You don't get to just fire fastballs at people on purpose with no Repurcussions. Baseball has the weirdest unwritten rules, many of which are in support of overly sensitive, butthurt pitchers.
I strongly disagree. Throwing at guys is absolute crap and an embarrassment to the sport.
That just feeds the problem.Not always. Sometimes you need to defend your teammates.