I don't know how old you are but my hero growing up was a guy named Tony Conigliaro. He was on his way to becoming a Hall of Famer. More HR's before the age of 22 than anyone in the history of the game at that point. He was blinded by a pitch. Changed his life. Throwing at someone is often part of the game. Not years later. It was a bush league move. Take Harper out of the equation and substitute, say Conforto. you have to stand up for yourself. If Harper doesn't charge the mound, Strickland just goes on like nothing happened. i don't fault Harper one bit.Guess I'm on an island on this one.
Pitchers hit batters. Deliberately. Weekly. Whether he's throwing 88 or 98 doesn't matter, and I don't think his assumed justification (home runs years ago) does either. In baseball, pitchers throw at batters and it's not usually a big deal. It only becomes a noteworthy situation when the brain-dead child in the batter's box has a meltdown. Given that, it's weird that his suspension is lighter than the suspension of the pitcher who didn't act outside the bounds of what's normal in the game.
Last edited by a moderator: