SCOTUS Ruling For NCAA Players - Education-Related Benefits | Syracusefan.com

SCOTUS Ruling For NCAA Players - Education-Related Benefits

Expect more lawsuits against the NCAA to broaden the ability of athletes to be compensated.
 
I'm following as others read through the decision. It's uh... going to be hard for the NCAA to continue to operate in their current model.

I'm not familiar with how all that works, but looking forward to reading more about it.
 
"With this much agreed it is unclear exactly what the NCAA seeks. To the extent it means to propose a sort of judicially ordained immunity from the terms of the Sherman Act for its restraints of trade—that we should overlook its restrictions because they happen to fall at the intersection of higher education, sports, and money—we cannot agree. This Court has regularly refused materially identical requests from litigants seeking special dispensation from the Sherman Act on the ground that their restraints of trade serve uniquely important social objectives beyond enhancing competition."
 
"But this case," Kavanaugh stresses, "involves only a narrow subset of the NCAA's compensation rules." He says he is writing to "underscore that the NCAA's remaining compensation rules also raise serious questions under the antitrust laws." (This is from SCOTUS Blog site chat.) It's being interpreted there as: "Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence pretty much begs for a case challenging the remaining NCAA rules (compensation)."
 
Yeah, this as a ruling in and of itself isn't Earth-shattering, but it's a huge warning to the NCAA that they can't continue as is.
 
Reading the decision I am not sure the court is willing to expand for non education economic compensation except maybe kavenaugh.
I expect the court to strike down the state laws on likeness compensation unless Congress acts. If Congress acts then those will be the new rules.
 
NCAA strategy is just play this as long as possible and do nothing knowing that the end is near?
 
Things I think are about to change in the NCAA and the ripple effects are going to be interesting to follow.

The NCAA model effectively has to be mostly blown up with the way this is trending. I presume the monumental task this would be has more to do with the NCAA fighting this than anything. Where does the money come from and how does it not turn into a much smaller list of schools participating in the top level of collegiate sports, whatever the future format looks like. The short of it is it is a giant mess to try and figure out.
 
The NCAA model effectively has to be mostly blown up with the way this is trending. I presume the monumental task this would be has more to do with the NCAA fighting this than anything. Where does the money come from and how does it not turn into a much smaller list of schools participating in the top level of collegiate sports, whatever the future format looks like. The short of it is it is a giant mess to try and figure out.
Without a doubt. Paying players for play is going to knock out a lot of collegiate institutions from being able to compete. But this is the way it's trending because it's what America wants. We'll see if fans across the country still like it after athletes start cashing in
 
It will be interesting to see how these academic perks align with state laws that forbid state financial aid and tax monies going toward athletics. Not every state has them, but quite a number do.
 

Similar threads

    • Like
  • Locked
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Tuesday for Football
Replies
0
Views
711
    • Like
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Monday for Football
Replies
1
Views
623
    • Like
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Thursday for Football
Replies
1
Views
781
    • Like
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Monday for Football
Replies
0
Views
641
    • Like
Orangeyes Daily Articles for Friday for Football
Replies
0
Views
635

Forum statistics

Threads
172,420
Messages
5,019,833
Members
6,027
Latest member
Old Timer

Online statistics

Members online
199
Guests online
3,115
Total visitors
3,314


...
Top Bottom