jdubs30
Living Legend
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2011
- Messages
- 15,614
- Like
- 34,800
Well if every post was just a different version of positivity…. That doesn’t make for good discourseAgain but why say the negative stuff?
Well if every post was just a different version of positivity…. That doesn’t make for good discourseAgain but why say the negative stuff?
There can be discourse but your statement was overboard is allWell if every post was just a different version of positivity…. That doesn’t make for good discourse
Watched a lot of division two basketball. Might know it better than anybody on this board. Can promise you that 13 ppg + some shaky games at d2 level is absolutely a reason for concern when considering a guy for ACC hoops. A lot of 19+ ppg scorers who have come through the ECC, etc translate well to low major, but that’s pretty much the ceiling, given extremely rare exceptions. I have zero concerns with him voicing his concerns about it. Everybody (and I mean everybody) at the collegiate level looks like a serviceable player on a highlight reel.There can be discourse but your statement was overboard is all
And they use a Nerf ball!But, the D2 3 point line is so much closer. 45% doesn't translate to D1.
I heard cover of the media guide and team captainI heard they're tapping this guy to start
As he will be. He ain’t starting lolWatched a lot of division two basketball. Might know it better than anybody on this board. Can promise you that 13 ppg + some shaky games at d2 level is absolutely a reason for concern when considering a guy for ACC hoops. A lot of 19+ ppg scorers who have come through the ECC, etc translate well to low major, but that’s pretty much the ceiling, given extremely rare exceptions. I have zero concerns with him voicing his concerns about it. Everybody (and I mean everybody) at the collegiate level looks like a serviceable player on a highlight reel.
11th, 12th man I have no problem with if staff sees something there.
I mean it’s pretty obvious to anyone that can count to atleast 10 that this guy at minimum would be the 11th man. We already have 9 guys and are actively looking for a starting center which would be #10. Obviously this kid isn’t gonna be playing quality minutes above anyone else already on this squad outside of I guess Moesch pending on if we get a lead guard ahead of Dual.Watched a lot of division two basketball. Might know it better than anybody on this board. Can promise you that 13 ppg + some shaky games at d2 level is absolutely a reason for concern when considering a guy for ACC hoops. A lot of 19+ ppg scorers who have come through the ECC, etc translate well to low major, but that’s pretty much the ceiling, given extremely rare exceptions. I have zero concerns with him voicing his concerns about it. Everybody (and I mean everybody) at the collegiate level looks like a serviceable player on a highlight reel.
11th, 12th man I have no problem with if staff sees something there.
Definitely agree. Especially at depth roles. The depth guards at high major + freshman guards at low majors are usually guys who either a) were high level high school scorers or b) had opportunities to play on a big aau circuit.Jaylen Wells started at D2 Sonoma State. I personally have played with people who played D1 amd D2 and the difference in guards isn’t as big as you might think. Bigs are a different story.
Definitely agree. Especially at depth roles. The depth guards at high major + freshman guards at low majors are usually guys who either a) were high level high school scorers or b) had opportunities to play on a big aau circuit.
So many guys sneak through the cracks and go JUCO/NAIA -> high production at D2 -> high production at low major. But those kids have always been 18+ ppg at d2, all conference type players. From experience… 13 ppg with a highlight tape punches above the production is typically a red flag. But as always, would love to be wrong and have full belief that the staff knows a lot more about the kid than me.
“Overboard?” Why are you so desperate to police?There can be discourse but your statement was overboard is all
I would much rather listen to one of the most respected national analysts as it relates to our current class. Certainly not done. Have there been a couple of misses Yes just a couple right. What if they are interested as it relates to a player off the bench if for anything a really nasty practice player. Do you remember Charlie Lockwood? Justify thatWe reachin and desperate ……….. no matter how it gets justified
Here's the analogy we didn't want Hodgson, maybe for the same reasons as it relates to character concerning Hodgson not wanting his own player.Hodgson didn’t even want Enis when he took the PC job
Here's the analogy we didn't want Hodgson, maybe for the same reasons as it relates to character concerning Hodgson not wanting his own player.
Why does this year feel like we're at a garage sale and last year we were buying from the lot?
Let’s try it, though! Don’t be so quick to dismiss! You’re very dismissive!Well if every post was just a different version of positivity…. That doesn’t make for good discourse
The portal prices went up a lot this year. We had to get 10 new players from the portal so not that much money to go aroundWhy does this year feel like we're at a garage sale and last year we were buying from the lot?
Some of these threads end up with posts that read like they just came from an incel looksmaxxing blackpilled forum