I thought we stopped recruiting Tucker after last summer for some deep dark secret reason. Why the new interest? Was it Hop who didn't want him? Hard to believe this late in game we have a realistic chance.
I think the dynamic for the two of them is (based on poster info and highlights), offensively Tucker is a 3/2 (skewing heavily towards 3 for us) and Brissett is a 4/3 (more of a 4 right now).If we were to land Tucker, that shouldn't effect Brissett's commitment, should it? Could you see them on the floor together? Would be interesting to see how good these two young forwards could be if we brought him in. I really like Oshae but I don't think that he will be a contributor next year simply because I'm not sold on the jumper yet. I see him fitting the mold of a Jerami Grant. I think Tucker could contribute right away.
Honestly, Tucker's transgression wasn't a big deal in the big scheme of things. It is being overblown in terms of "trouble."
Recruiting visits are a two way audition. Zero problem with our coaches deciding to maybe move on, and zero problems with them deciding to get back involved. If he had done something really problematic, it would be a different story. But it really wasn't that bad. If / when it eventually comes out [and I think a lot of people have already alluded to it], I assume most would just shrug their shoulders. This wasn't some insurmountable thing, a big problem, or some enormous red flag.
NoWas Howard involved in Tucker's visit as well? Somebody better be keeping Howard on lockdown/house arrest whenever future PG/SG dudes better than him come visit.
Doesn't phase me one bit. Load up on whatever remaining talent we have left. We have a talent in Tyus Battle that comes once a decade. We gotta capitalize.Speaks to the desperation of the staff that they're chasing him again after backing off of him.
Speaks to the desperation of the staff that they're chasing him again after backing off of him.
Okay, but if it was that big of a deal then we wouldn't be back recruiting him. I think it was moreso that he moved to Georgia, as to the major reason we stopped going after him hard.
It doesn't bother me either, but you dropped all comms with his camp for months to come circling back when things haven't gone your way? If the transgression wasn't a big deal, they should have maintained a relationship with him.
It doesn't bother me either, but you dropped all comms with his camp for months to come circling back when things haven't gone your way? If the transgression wasn't a big deal, they should have maintained a relationship with him.
Honestly, Tucker's transgression wasn't a big deal in the big scheme of things. It is being overblown in terms of "trouble."
Recruiting visits are a two way audition. Zero problem with our coaches deciding to maybe move on, and zero problems with them deciding to get back involved. If he had done something really problematic, it would be a different story. But it really wasn't that bad. If / when it eventually comes out [and I think a lot of people have already alluded to it], I assume most would just shrug their shoulders. This wasn't some insurmountable thing, a big problem, or some enormous red flag.
Once a decade?Doesn't phase me one bit. Load up on whatever remaining talent we have left. We have a talent in Tyus Battle that comes once a decade. We gotta capitalize.
Once a decade?
Think Battle's gonna end up being better than Dion (at least in college) and I don't think we've had anyone that good/NBA since 2006/2007.
Hmm. I haven't given it a ton of thought, but I'm not sure Dion even makes my top 5 of guys since 2006/7.
I think we still have a chance for Tucker since he's willing to listen and we were always high on his list