Some frustrated snap reactions after taking an hour to cool down | Page 4 | Syracusefan.com

Some frustrated snap reactions after taking an hour to cool down

Must’ve been a blown assignment by Safety. I have to believe there’s no way the staff puts him on island considering all you rightly mentioned.
This is my assumption as well, but it didnt look like either safety had even the slightest thought “I should be deep right now” and of course that Stanford play last year was also a clear sign of hubris by our staff as well.

Either way, since it happened, it’s a learning moment for staff and players. With luck Samuels is bottling that feeling he had of allowing it, and is working hard this week to make sure it doesn’t happen again, at least to the extent it’s within his control.
 
On D…… is it a talent issue or a scheme and play calling issue…… I know we don’t have the talent we’d like but is that the main culprit? You saw what Tenn D does with stunts, blitzes, delayed blitzes. You don’t need huge talent to make things happen (Tenn does have talent). You do need play calling that has a plan and knows when to call certain plays at certain times. Good play callers make things look easy. The players typically get the credit. But look at every pressure and sack. A lot of creativity in how Tenn D attacked our line. Correct me if I’m wrong, I don’t see that in our playcalling.
I wonder who SU has for defensive "consultants"? It seems like the staff could use a former DC to fill in the strategic areas that ERob is weak in.
 
This was a money grab and we need the money. Hated that it was the same year we go to South Bend but oh well, they’re not offering this any year we want.

The rest of the schedule is just unfortunate based on the shuffling after adding the west coast teams.

In this era, I’m fine with scheduling attractive teams, as long as their home and homes. This one was a one off.
 
We don’t have one Darius, Ponds, Bulluck or Freeney - not one play maker anywhere - really weak at LB - I agree we have to come up with some creative sets - felt like every sack they had came off a blitz unblocked
If talent on D is still a problem in year 3 of Fran then you have to start questioning what the Fluck is going on. We should be seeing some signs of life in year 2.
 
Like I said in the game thread yesterday,

The biggest difference in this game was on the line of scrimmage. Their QB (who in my opinion was quite bad, and will be Tennessee’s downfall this year) had all day to throw, and for his WRs to find open holes in a zone defense. We had absolutely no pass rush, and it took guys more than 3 seconds to disengage from a block to try and slowly plod after the QB.

Just looking at the way their RBs went down is also tell-tale about the lack of talent (or at least strength) compared to ours. Even when we did clog the lanes and that back had no where to go, every time it seemed to take us 3-4 guys to wrestle their backs to the ground. Which then allowed them to fall forward for another 2-3-4 yards.

Their OL opened up lanes, climbed to the second level well and ours held their own against what I suspect will prove a dominant front in the SEC. Unfortunately we didnt excel, and we were terribly unprepared for their delayed blitzes and stunt game. Their creativity created some luck (the diving INT, and the lucky bounce leading to the scoop and score) and they took advantage. If that INT hits the turf and if that fumbles squirts all the way out of bounds, the game is a whole heck of a lot closer in the fourth quarter.

We aren’t a bad team. We had critical errors at key moments yesterday and couldn’t recover. When you go to play a team that’s highly talented and very experienced, you cannot do that and expect to win. You have to play an extremely clean game. We did not. Thus the result. The reality always was (even if we didnt know it yet) that we were overmatched in the trenches, particularly along the Dline. Only way to overcome just how big a competitive gap we displayed yesterday was to be flawless elsewhere. Clearly we were not.

Team is still going to be strong this year, but we need to be a lot cleaner in other ways, and certainly need to scheme up something against the run, quickly.

Side note: Demetres Samuels played well in my opinion. He got picked on early, but also made some damn good plays. That deep ball annoys me from a scheme perspective. Why are we leaving him on an island, like he is Darrelle Revis, in his first college game, against a burner, and a QB that we couldn’t even get close enough to breathe on? Is that just our coaches having too much faith in him before he’s proven it in games? Is that a safety screwing up his assignment so bad he’s not in the play?

Believe it or not, lots to be encouraged by yesterday. Even if we got taken behind the woodshed in the first quarter. Thought we pretty much controlled the second half aside from that damn interception and that final gotta have a stop drive.
The offense gives us some reason to be optimistic but the narrative that we controlled the 2nd half while chasing points is a little bit of a homer take. Tennessee didn’t have to play overly aggressive once they got up 17. They wanted to save some of their playbook for their tougher games.
 
Of course it is the coaching. We have the talent, except at DE. Which is a big, glaring gap -- admittedly. But everywhere else, we have the horses.

I think that ERob might have had things easier at aTm, where they recruit nothing but blue chip guys. So you're bound to have quality d-linemen at a factory like that. Here, where coaching matters, and we have to build up quality depth, you get exposed if you can't coach.

Well... he struggled as a DC last year, and didn't inspire today. He seems like the weak link on an otherwise good staff. Just IMO.
Agree with what you’re saying; he’s no Tony White. We need a DC of this caliber
 
The new ACC calculations of TV eyeballs for money makes this a good year for Cuse. Not sure if they count non-conference networks (ND game)
 
If talent on D is still a problem in year 3 of Fran then you have to start questioning what the Fluck is going on. We should be seeing some signs of life in year 2.
looked to me like the Tennessee RBS were knocking our linemen backwards on contact.
 
It all just looks so passive. We don't seem to try and take anything away. And we're fairly predictable.

The dichotomy in third down confidence between the coordinators is incredible. I feel at ease with whatever Nixon calls on 3rd down on offense, regardless of distance. But with ERob, 3rd and long is terrifying and the terror is too often rewarded because he's content to let the opponent run the play they want.

Maddening.
Exactly
 
The offense gives us some reason to be optimistic but the narrative that we controlled the 2nd half while chasing points is a little bit of a homer take. Tennessee didn’t have to play overly aggressive once they got up 17. They wanted to save some of their playbook for their tougher games.
Oh they definitely took the foot off the gas on O. But we also played better assignment football. It’s hard to say how close things would have ended up if Tenn had gone all out all 60 minutes, but they gave us a chance at the end and we didnt take advantage of it.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,029
Messages
5,129,486
Members
6,098
Latest member
volsfan

Online statistics

Members online
203
Guests online
1,950
Total visitors
2,153


...
Top Bottom