SUOrange44
Scout Team
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2011
- Messages
- 326
- Like
- 970
Since the thread I started on Saturday on this issue, there have been some developments as you all know by now. First, the athletic director and interim finance director have taken an "administrative leave" and returned to retirement respectively. Although there is no doubt that the actions of the Board of Trustees late last night precipitated that series of events, the way that this has been portrayed is innocuous. NOTHING about this situation is innocuous.
Second, Paterno issued his statement yesterday. Absolute and utter bull that certainly gives some insight of where this is headed. He basically claims that the severity of the allegations from the GA were not made clear to him. To qoute SNL...Really ? really ? Really ? Even if this was simply described to Paterno in an emergency meeting at his house of naked horseplay in a shower re: an adult and a child, isn't that enough to really take some significant proactive steps ? Mix in the fact that the University was clearly aware of "allegations" at the least in the '90s regarding the same person and if that does not put you on alert you either a complete idiot or someone who intentionally stepped as far away from the situation as he thought possible in order to claim plausible deniability.
Recap...the witness who has been found extremely credible by the GJ supposedly "undersold" what he saw to Paterno. Ummm...yeah. Right.
This only serves to further my belief Saturday that Paterno needs to go asap along with the University President who, at the least, issued one of the most idiotic public support statements that I have ever heard (even with time for preparation). Maybe he went to the same school of spin control as tOSU president Gordon Gee.
What next ? To be honest, if the chips fall where they appear to be heading and there was negligence either by act or omission by Penn State that allowed this activity to continue for as long as it allegedly did, other institutions of higher learning need to take a stand.
The NCAA and the member schools are more than willing to threaten boycotts or refuse to play certain games in states (Arizona for instance due to treatment of illegals, MLK holiday issues, etc.) and nicknames (Fighting Sioux for instance at North Dakota). Personally, if I am on the Board at Syracuse University, I make darn well sure that I opt out or simply pay the cancellation fee that all these games have for any remaining series against PSU. To sit by and take no action if this heads where we ultimately think it will head is completely wrong in my mind.
We would have had a chancellor who rallied against the mascot at the University of Illinois but sat still and allowed the institution she leads to continue with a contract against a school that, if nothing else, may have harborded a predator for the "good of the program" would be completely hypocritical in my mind.
I suppose the concern will always be "what happens when/if some sort of scandal hits our school in the future?" Not enough of a concern. You isolate them and do nothing to facilitate their well being as a football program if you can help it. Just me thoughts...
SUOrange44
Second, Paterno issued his statement yesterday. Absolute and utter bull that certainly gives some insight of where this is headed. He basically claims that the severity of the allegations from the GA were not made clear to him. To qoute SNL...Really ? really ? Really ? Even if this was simply described to Paterno in an emergency meeting at his house of naked horseplay in a shower re: an adult and a child, isn't that enough to really take some significant proactive steps ? Mix in the fact that the University was clearly aware of "allegations" at the least in the '90s regarding the same person and if that does not put you on alert you either a complete idiot or someone who intentionally stepped as far away from the situation as he thought possible in order to claim plausible deniability.
Recap...the witness who has been found extremely credible by the GJ supposedly "undersold" what he saw to Paterno. Ummm...yeah. Right.
This only serves to further my belief Saturday that Paterno needs to go asap along with the University President who, at the least, issued one of the most idiotic public support statements that I have ever heard (even with time for preparation). Maybe he went to the same school of spin control as tOSU president Gordon Gee.
What next ? To be honest, if the chips fall where they appear to be heading and there was negligence either by act or omission by Penn State that allowed this activity to continue for as long as it allegedly did, other institutions of higher learning need to take a stand.
The NCAA and the member schools are more than willing to threaten boycotts or refuse to play certain games in states (Arizona for instance due to treatment of illegals, MLK holiday issues, etc.) and nicknames (Fighting Sioux for instance at North Dakota). Personally, if I am on the Board at Syracuse University, I make darn well sure that I opt out or simply pay the cancellation fee that all these games have for any remaining series against PSU. To sit by and take no action if this heads where we ultimately think it will head is completely wrong in my mind.
We would have had a chancellor who rallied against the mascot at the University of Illinois but sat still and allowed the institution she leads to continue with a contract against a school that, if nothing else, may have harborded a predator for the "good of the program" would be completely hypocritical in my mind.
I suppose the concern will always be "what happens when/if some sort of scandal hits our school in the future?" Not enough of a concern. You isolate them and do nothing to facilitate their well being as a football program if you can help it. Just me thoughts...
SUOrange44