I was thinking the same thing - Bing on the same level as GMAC and Buddy is comedy enough but then add Scoop...egads
I’ll reverse that -
Adding Buddy to a line that has GMAC & Scoop on it is - egads.
Scoop is quietly one of our very best PG’s, ever.
In spite of not playing much as a Frosh, and being 6th man (of the year!!) as a Soph, he’s 6th all-time in assists at Cuse.
SECOND all-time in steals!!
He’s also at #41 in the top 100 for career scoring.
It wasn’t an accident or coincidence that he was an integral part of our two very best TEAMS ever -
2010 & 2012.
Buddy = Matt Roe w the greenest light ever.
Buddy was a volume shooter & scorer on our worst teams in history.
There’s not room on the top line, but;
Bing is a $5 player.
Period. Full stop.
And I know it’s “recency” bias, but -
He was waaaaay better than Moten.
With only 3 years to play varsity ball in college, and no 3pt line.
So worst case - he’s a $4 player here.
Given that Rak is the only true C on the entire list
(Yeah, you could certainly play DC there),
you’re kinda forced to chose him as a bargain, or go big w DC, and then fill in around them.
So…
DC (at the 4)
Sherm
Bing
Rak
Eli
But honestly, you could swap DC for Melo OR Billy and still have a kickass squad, because Sherm would get whomever it was the ball.
And both of those guys were big enough and boarded well, so they could play college PF easily.