Townie72
All American
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 5,905
- Like
- 6,451
I watched it for years. Maryland fans, who root for a team with a proud basketball history, were defenseless against a single Duke cheer, “You are not our rivals”.
The cheer communicated that Maryland lacked the status to be Duke’s rival. It was humiliating to the Maryland fans, especially because of how much they hated Duke, how much the MD v. Duke games frequently meant and how strongly they felt that Duke really was a “rival”.
But of one side says it isn’t a rivalry, it’s not.
The Dukies know from experience how effective this tactic is, so if SU fans say there’s a rivalry, the Dukies will say there isn’t …. Regardless of how much evidence there is (e.g., Duke vs Maryland). It’s a no-win situation.
If the two teams stay good, especially if UNC recedes, it’ll happen. K seemed to say that in his post-game comments. I think he sees the value to Duke in a strong competitive relationship with SU
But SU fans need to be the last to say such a thing exists. Say the “R” word and you are walking into a trap.
Here’s how we have used the “Not your rival” gambit:
A poll on the Rutgers football board recently asked, “Which school do you hate the most?” The overwhelming winner was “Syracuse”. A school they no longer play and with whom there were very few meaningful games. Their complaint was that “We never gave the respect they thought was due. We would never admit to a “Rivalry”. They still feel the sting of that disrespect. (And most of us didn’t because we thought that Rutgers lacked the stature to be an SU rival and that what Rutgers was trying to do was hitchhike on our history as a way of making their program appear bigger and better than it actually was.)
The cheer communicated that Maryland lacked the status to be Duke’s rival. It was humiliating to the Maryland fans, especially because of how much they hated Duke, how much the MD v. Duke games frequently meant and how strongly they felt that Duke really was a “rival”.
But of one side says it isn’t a rivalry, it’s not.
The Dukies know from experience how effective this tactic is, so if SU fans say there’s a rivalry, the Dukies will say there isn’t …. Regardless of how much evidence there is (e.g., Duke vs Maryland). It’s a no-win situation.
If the two teams stay good, especially if UNC recedes, it’ll happen. K seemed to say that in his post-game comments. I think he sees the value to Duke in a strong competitive relationship with SU
But SU fans need to be the last to say such a thing exists. Say the “R” word and you are walking into a trap.
Here’s how we have used the “Not your rival” gambit:
A poll on the Rutgers football board recently asked, “Which school do you hate the most?” The overwhelming winner was “Syracuse”. A school they no longer play and with whom there were very few meaningful games. Their complaint was that “We never gave the respect they thought was due. We would never admit to a “Rivalry”. They still feel the sting of that disrespect. (And most of us didn’t because we thought that Rutgers lacked the stature to be an SU rival and that what Rutgers was trying to do was hitchhike on our history as a way of making their program appear bigger and better than it actually was.)