OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 233,818
- Like
- 425,564
Looks like they raised damn near $1.7 million in 24 hours. I don't have a big frame of reference for things like this, but that seems pretty damn good. It'll be interesting to see the breakdown.
EDIT: Looks like they raised over $1.75 million in 24 hours.
I think Colgate is a lot better at fund raising than Syracuse is. Props to them.For reference, Colgate raised $5.1M with 5,683 donors back in December 2013 in a similar one day event.
For reference, Colgate raised $5.1M with 5,683 donors back in December 2013 in a similar one day event.
For reference, Colgate raised $5.1M with 5,683 donors back in December 2013 in a similar one day event.
MSOrange linked an article above that had a number of very successful campaigns. The most impressive was Purdue which raised over $18 million in one day with more than 12k donations. That's big time. Here's the link again: 6 Hugely Successful Higher Ed Social Media Days of Giving - eCity InteractiveColgate was helped by 4 different people each donating $1m. That's what SU lacked this time.
For reference, Colgate raised $5.1M with 5,683 donors back in December 2013 in a similar one day event.
Colgate was helped by 4 different people each donating $1m. That's what SU lacked this time.
Thank you for this synopsis. Such a great and important idea to make us "poor" supporters of the school feel important and to give us a chance to offer our support in a way that energizes everyone and puts a daily goal on the table. Using social media and generating buzz made it that much more effective. Getting alums used to donating and putting a face on who those people are is so important. They should try and do this once or twice a year, and create growing benchmarks. 3000 donations this time, 5k, then 10k, etc.So, Yes, this was our first ever 24 hour campaign, and they did a really good job on the first one. This campaign goal was specifically not meant to target high net worth donors, but to increase the numbers that donate. Part of this push is to increase our rankings. 5% of college rankings are derived from how many people give to a college. They feel that in the past there was no effort given to encouraging lower donation amounts. That was part the goal of the 24 hour campaign. Those of us who worked as ambassadors of this campaign were told to push even $10 donations, just to get people to donate. There was one large matching donor. They are better off going after the major donors on a one to one basis. This campaign was also to get many into the habit of making at least one donation a year. As our national alumni president tweeted out about pushing a $20 donation, hey you spend so much more than that a week on Starbucks.
Also, if they do anything, it will only be paypal. It has taken pulling teeth to even get them to consider paypal. So one thing for now, and paypal is the goal.
I believe the answer had to do with costs associated with it. Venmo is much harder to work with than paypal from what I was told. I think one step at a time is gong to be the approach. Most have both. I use both. As long as I have a one button option to pay, that is the goal.I have to ask... why? Why the resistance to making donating as easy as humanly possible? If people can just quick link a donation from the variety of ways of one click payments (including Paypal)... wouldn't it obviously lead to more donations?
This.So, Yes, this was our first ever 24 hour campaign, and they did a really good job on the first one. This campaign goal was specifically not meant to target high net worth donors, but to increase the numbers that donate. Part of this push is to increase our rankings. 5% of college rankings are derived from how many people give to a college. They feel that in the past there was no effort given to encouraging lower donation amounts. That was part the goal of the 24 hour campaign. Those of us who worked as ambassadors of this campaign were told to push even $10 donations, just to get people to donate. There was one large matching donor. They are better off going after the major donors on a one to one basis. This campaign was also to get many into the habit of making at least one donation a year. As our national alumni president tweeted out about pushing a $20 donation, hey you spend so much more than that a week on Starbucks.
Also, if they do anything, it will only be paypal. It has taken pulling teeth to even get them to consider paypal. So one thing for now, and paypal is the goal.
I believe the answer had to do with costs associated with it. Venmo is much harder to work with than paypal from what I was told. I think one step at a time is gong to be the approach. Most have both. I use both. As long as I have a one button option to pay, that is the goal.
Gulp...Just to give you a sense of what other schools do and how they do it:
Columbia had their giving day today. Obviously their alumni base should have a few more dollars to spare on average, but the numbers are pretty staggering:
Columbia Giving Day 2017
Just to give you a sense of what other schools do and how they do it:
Columbia had their giving day today. Obviously their alumni base should have a few more dollars to spare on average, but the numbers are pretty staggering:
Columbia Giving Day 2017