Well... at least for me the year after year ends in 2015.8+ regular season wins then a good bowl game, win or lose.
Surprised so many SU fans year after year define success as 6 wins and any bowl game.
Success can be defined as meeting the minimum standard, which is 6 and a bowl win.8+ regular season wins then a good bowl game, win or lose.
Surprised so many SU fans year after year define success as 6 wins and any bowl game.
Success can be defined as meeting the minimum standard, which is 6 and a bowl win.
That said, the GOAL should be 8 and a bowl win for 9.
I'll probably kill them on here for not doing that, but realistically I don't see it.
I'd take beating 1 of the big 4, a What loss and a normal L to say Pitt for a 7 + bowl win season and be happy.
I also don't believe in the QB so...
Long term nobody will be satisfied with six wins, but progress is slow and steady. Realistically, this year's schedule has three nearly automatic losses (Notre Dame, Florida State, & Clemson) and two nearly automatic wins (Villanova & Central Michigan). 4 - 3 against Maryland and the rest of the ACC is reasonable to me.rrlbees said:Surprised so many SU fans year after year define success as 6 wins and any bowl game.
donniesyracuse said:Long term nobody will be satisfied with six wins, but progress is slow and steady. Realistically, this year's schedule has three nearly automatic losses (Notre Dame, Florida State, & Clemson) and two nearly automatic wins (Villanova & Central Michigan). 4 - 3 against Maryland and the rest of the ACC is reasonable to me.
Long term nobody will be satisfied with six wins, but progress is slow and steady. Realistically, this year's schedule has three nearly automatic losses (Notre Dame, Florida State, & Clemson) and two nearly automatic wins (Villanova & Central Michigan). 4 - 3 against Maryland and the rest of the ACC is reasonable to me.
We're going to kick their golden dome butts.Of course nothing is automatic. It was a poor choice of words, but I would confidently pencil it in as a loss. Notre Dame will be significant favorites (at least two touchdowns I suspect). I also believe Notre Dame will be better this year. It's not an automatic loss, but it is not a game where one can objectively and reasonably predict a win.
more than tuckit and run hunt.Did you believe in Nassib after his sophomore year?.
more than tuckit and run hunt.
both are as accurate as a whiffle ball on the beach, but i thought nassib had a little more potential.
hope im wrong
what was ridiculous about the playbook??Arguably, we had some of the worst receivers in the ACC, a ridiculous play book and a soph QB who did not even have the advantage of a full pre-season taking all the reps.
The jury may be still out on his passing game but the verdict certainly is in on his leadership - Hunt is a winner.
Keep the faith - Go Orange!
At the beginning of the season it had too many plays and took long to get plays in. As the season wore on they simplified it. The QB isn't the only player that has to understand the playbook.what was ridiculous about the playbook??
did hunt not understand it?
was it too tough for him??
i think he had it down pat...1 mississippi look downfield...2 mississippi panic...3 mississippi tuck it and run (granted often for a 1st down)
or was not the play??
more than tuckit and run hunt.
both are as accurate as a whiffle ball on the beach, but i thought nassib had a little more potential.
hope im wrong
8+ regular season wins then a good bowl game, win or lose.
Surprised so many SU fans year after year define success as 6 wins and any bowl game.
Maybe this is a semantics issue for some...
The issue is what would be a "successful" season, not necessarily how many games you "expect" to win or have as a "goal."
For those setting the bar for "success'" at 8+ wins, it means that anything less than 8 wins is not successful (or failure). That does not seem reasonable to me.
Those that evaluate this kind of stuff for a living have set the O/U at 5.5.