The all-inclusive Rutgers dumpster fire thread... | Page 525 | Syracusefan.com
.

The all-inclusive Rutgers dumpster fire thread...

Roger N said:
I think it was lit up Red because revenue is down for the Empire State building
Expand...
Or maybe the ESB was lit in red on honor of Rutgers' AD financial management performance, which is only in red.
 
TexanMark said:
Expand...


Rutgers is a very solid school.

They are ranked #41 nationally in this year's US News & World Report ranking, whereas Syracuse is #73. (Seton Hall, for the record, is #146).

Rutgers Law has fallen off the map, though, since I went there, and is now rated about on par with Syracuse Law, ranked outside the Top 100. Yikes.

Back in the 1990s, Rutgers was about on par with Fordham; better than St. John's, Seton Hall, Yeshiva, Brooklyn Law, but clearly below Columbia, NYU and Cornell. I mean, Ruth Bader Ginsberg had been on the faculty within the last 10 years, when I went there, before being appointed to the Federal Court.

Football? they may have invented it, but they certainly don't play it.
 
IthacaMatt said:
Rutgers is a very solid school.

They are ranked #41 nationally in this year's US News & World Report ranking, whereas Syracuse is #73. (Seton Hall, for the record, is #146).

Rutgers Law has fallen off the map, though, since I went there, and is now rated about on par with Syracuse Law, ranked outside the Top 100. Yikes.

Back in the 1990s, Rutgers was about on par with Fordham; better than St. John's, Seton Hall, Yeshiva, Brooklyn Law, but clearly below Columbia, NYU and Cornell. I mean, Ruth Bader Ginsberg had been on the faculty within the last 10 years, when I went there, before being appointed to the Federal Court.

Football? they may have invented it, but they certainly don't play it.
Expand...
Wow Cuse has dropped
 
Cheriehoop said:
Who in the Ivy League charges $15k more?
Expand...

The Ivy League charges less, Syracuse is more.
But the Ivy League's tuition agreement seems to have been abandoned, based on what I saw online just now. Ivy's are maybe $5-10K less, all inclusive / on campus.
 
  1. Syracuse University
  2. Admissions and Aid

Financial Aid and Scholarships​

We believe that a world-class education should be available to every admitted student who wants to attend, regardless of financial need. More than 81% of our students receive aid—the majority of it in the form of grants and scholarships that do not have to be repaid.
 
IthacaMatt said:
Rutgers is a very solid school.

They are ranked #41 nationally in this year's US News & World Report ranking, whereas Syracuse is #73. (Seton Hall, for the record, is #146).

Rutgers Law has fallen off the map, though, since I went there, and is now rated about on par with Syracuse Law, ranked outside the Top 100. Yikes.

Back in the 1990s, Rutgers was about on par with Fordham; better than St. John's, Seton Hall, Yeshiva, Brooklyn Law, but clearly below Columbia, NYU and Cornell. I mean, Ruth Bader Ginsberg had been on the faculty within the last 10 years, when I went there, before being appointed to the Federal Court.

Football? they may have invented it, but they certainly don't play it.
Expand...
You obviously misread the syllabus on this thread.
 
e259b585-92c4-418f-92b9-dc91f9a2d9d9.jpg
 
wfschrec said:
Well you could spin it into a positive ... like ... "See we have better defenses in the ACC so obviously you'll punt more" or "we don't play at a snails pace like they do in the B1G so we have double the possessions and double the punts on avg" :)
Expand...
The B1G would counter with numbers 1 & 5. Though, playing three yards and a cloud of dust football should not give the team enough opportunities to rank so high; yet, Rutgers never fails to deliver in the most inappropriate manner.
 
Why The Sixers Shouldn't Take Either Rutgers Player At #3. Makes sense to me:

"I would not pick someone who played at Rutgers last season, which Harper and Bailey both did. I would not pick someone who was one of the two best players on a team that finished 15-17, that lost 12 of its 20 games in the Big Ten, and that failed to qualify for the NCAA Tournament. I would not presume or bet or even hope that one of the two best players on a team like that would turn out to be one of the two best players on an NBA team that had any chance of winning a championship or winning a division title or even making the playoffs."

"I would pick someone else because — with all of those caveats and all of that context and all of Harper’s and Bailey’s talent and potential — I cannot get past one nagging thought: If Harper and Bailey were truly outstanding players, if they were truly worth using such high picks on them, then Rutgers would have been better for their presence. If they were that good, the Scarlet Knights would not have been perhaps the most disappointing team in Division I basketball last season."

That's just a taste. But I agree.
 
Symphony Steve said:
Why The Sixers Shouldn't Take Either Rutgers Player At #3. Makes sense to me:

"I would not pick someone who played at Rutgers last season, which Harper and Bailey both did. I would not pick someone who was one of the two best players on a team that finished 15-17, that lost 12 of its 20 games in the Big Ten, and that failed to qualify for the NCAA Tournament. I would not presume or bet or even hope that one of the two best players on a team like that would turn out to be one of the two best players on an NBA team that had any chance of winning a championship or winning a division title or even making the playoffs."

"I would pick someone else because — with all of those caveats and all of that context and all of Harper’s and Bailey’s talent and potential — I cannot get past one nagging thought: If Harper and Bailey were truly outstanding players, if they were truly worth using such high picks on them, then Rutgers would have been better for their presence. If they were that good, the Scarlet Knights would not have been perhaps the most disappointing team in Division I basketball last season."

That's just a taste. But I agree.
Expand...
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/45541843/ace-bailey-cancels-76ers-visit-ahead-nba-draft':

"Former Rutgers star Ace Bailey has canceled a visit to the Philadelphia 76ers, sources told ESPN.

Bailey, the No. 3 prospect on ESPN's big board, was slated to fly to Philadelphia on Friday for dinner with the team's front office and a private workout, but elected to cancel Wednesday, sources told ESPN.

The 76ers own the No. 3 pick in Wednesday's draft at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, New York.

Bailey's predraft strategy has perplexed NBA teams over the past month, as he is currently the only U.S.-based prospect yet to visit any clubs. He has declined invitations from multiple teams in his draft range, which is considered to be anywhere from No. 3 to No. 8."
 
Symphony Steve said:
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/45541843/ace-bailey-cancels-76ers-visit-ahead-nba-draft':

"Former Rutgers star Ace Bailey has canceled a visit to the Philadelphia 76ers, sources told ESPN.

Bailey, the No. 3 prospect on ESPN's big board, was slated to fly to Philadelphia on Friday for dinner with the team's front office and a private workout, but elected to cancel Wednesday, sources told ESPN.

The 76ers own the No. 3 pick in Wednesday's draft at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, New York.

Bailey's predraft strategy has perplexed NBA teams over the past month, as he is currently the only U.S.-based prospect yet to visit any clubs. He has declined invitations from multiple teams in his draft range, which is considered to be anywhere from No. 3 to No. 8."
Expand...
A very strange strategy, to be sure.


So very, very Rutgers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
173,911
Messages
5,120,496
Members
6,074
Latest member
CheerMom12

Share this page

Online statistics

Members online
191
Guests online
986
Total visitors
1,177
Totals may include hidden visitors.


...
Top Bottom