I'll play. Is an extension better than no extension, or not? You seem to be saying that it makes no difference, since it is an "illusion" that should be "seen through" and can be "dismissed". Why then don't all coaches get hired on a year-to-year contract from the get-go? Folks here are complaining about game management skills, time management, etc. Why does a school have to wait 2 or 3 years to assess the coach on those metrics? Can him at the end of year 1 if he isn't cutting it. Kids, parents, etc. should have known it could be coming. Good recruiter, who cares? I see coaching extensions as sort of like a marriage. No guarantee that it'll work out, but the commitment of resources steers things toward making it work. Maybe it's a non-issue for factories with gigantic budgets, and donors that can, and will, buy out a coach's contract. Not here. An extension is a measure of a school's commitment toward a coach. Seeing that commitment is important. Dismissing it as an "illusion" is silly, IMO.